| Project Name | karthick |
| Project Name | karthick |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 374.9 | 222.7 | 205.3 | 110.3 | 99.7 | 77.0 | 63.3 | 62.4 | 61.6 | 52.6 | 48.7 | 39.2 |
| Cluster size | 450 | 217 | 273 | 194 | 129 | 115 | 107 | 120 | 114 | 94 | 103 | 84 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.62 | 2.95 | 3.24 | 2.68 | 3.15 | 4.39 | 3.30 | 3.19 | 2.60 | 3.44 | 2.63 | 3.00 |
| GDT_TS | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.67 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 3.27 | 2.21 | 2.91 | 4.09 | 3.05 | 2.51 | 2.40 | 2.94 | 2.62 | 2.19 |
| 2 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 1.27 | 2.95 | 3.18 | 3.24 | 3.03 | 3.15 | 3.63 | 4.40 | 3.35 | 3.61 |
| 3 | 3.27 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 3.10 | 3.37 | 2.75 | 3.09 | 3.36 | 3.82 | 4.66 | 3.55 | 4.02 |
| 4 | 2.21 | 2.95 | 3.10 | 0.00 | 1.78 | 3.41 | 1.84 | 1.87 | 2.82 | 3.71 | 2.35 | 3.17 |
| 5 | 2.91 | 3.18 | 3.37 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 3.66 | 1.92 | 2.15 | 3.01 | 3.79 | 2.59 | 3.21 |
| 6 | 4.09 | 3.24 | 2.75 | 3.41 | 3.66 | 0.00 | 3.36 | 3.60 | 4.57 | 5.07 | 4.53 | 4.76 |
| 7 | 3.05 | 3.03 | 3.09 | 1.84 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 0.00 | 1.42 | 3.39 | 4.22 | 2.46 | 3.37 |
| 8 | 2.51 | 3.15 | 3.36 | 1.87 | 2.15 | 3.60 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 3.08 | 3.59 | 2.67 | 2.68 |
| 9 | 2.40 | 3.63 | 3.82 | 2.82 | 3.01 | 4.57 | 3.39 | 3.08 | 0.00 | 1.83 | 2.26 | 2.01 |
| 10 | 2.94 | 4.40 | 4.66 | 3.71 | 3.79 | 5.07 | 4.22 | 3.59 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 3.38 | 2.01 |
| 11 | 2.62 | 3.35 | 3.55 | 2.35 | 2.59 | 4.53 | 2.46 | 2.67 | 2.26 | 3.38 | 0.00 | 2.86 |
| 12 | 2.19 | 3.61 | 4.02 | 3.17 | 3.21 | 4.76 | 3.37 | 2.68 | 2.01 | 2.01 | 2.86 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.87 |
| 2 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.72 |
| 3 | 0.70 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.71 |
| 4 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.68 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.70 |
| 5 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.72 |
| 6 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.58 |
| 7 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.73 |
| 8 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.65 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.83 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.86 |
| 10 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.80 |
| 11 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.57 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.77 |
| 12 | 0.87 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.58 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013