| Project Name | lol |
| Project Name | lol |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 635.5 | 457.8 | 297.9 | 207.4 | 189.5 | 188.3 | 143.7 | 139.0 | 101.8 | 72.1 | 41.1 | 31.2 |
| Cluster size | 397 | 380 | 263 | 155 | 160 | 173 | 128 | 138 | 88 | 66 | 24 | 28 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.15 | 3.12 | 3.60 | 4.53 | 4.78 | 4.32 | 4.37 | 3.81 | 5.10 | 3.52 | 5.56 | 4.41 |
| GDT_TS | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.75 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.89 | 3.31 | 1.11 | 2.02 | 2.04 | 2.59 | 2.53 | 2.36 | 3.17 | 1.49 | 2.50 |
| 2 | 3.89 | 0.00 | 1.10 | 3.60 | 3.64 | 3.12 | 2.31 | 2.55 | 2.99 | 1.66 | 4.26 | 2.67 |
| 3 | 3.31 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 3.11 | 3.34 | 2.84 | 1.67 | 2.45 | 2.30 | 1.36 | 3.66 | 2.28 |
| 4 | 1.11 | 3.60 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 1.44 | 1.38 | 2.58 | 1.89 | 2.57 | 2.85 | 2.02 | 2.47 |
| 5 | 2.02 | 3.64 | 3.34 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 2.85 | 1.50 | 2.74 | 3.01 | 2.66 | 2.78 |
| 6 | 2.04 | 3.12 | 2.84 | 1.38 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2.54 | 0.88 | 2.57 | 2.59 | 2.67 | 2.32 |
| 7 | 2.59 | 2.31 | 1.67 | 2.58 | 2.85 | 2.54 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 1.35 | 1.38 | 3.00 | 2.31 |
| 8 | 2.53 | 2.55 | 2.45 | 1.89 | 1.50 | 0.88 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 2.52 | 2.14 | 3.07 | 2.19 |
| 9 | 2.36 | 2.99 | 2.30 | 2.57 | 2.74 | 2.57 | 1.35 | 2.52 | 0.00 | 2.10 | 2.70 | 1.90 |
| 10 | 3.17 | 1.66 | 1.36 | 2.85 | 3.01 | 2.59 | 1.38 | 2.14 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 3.61 | 2.21 |
| 11 | 1.49 | 4.26 | 3.66 | 2.02 | 2.66 | 2.67 | 3.00 | 3.07 | 2.70 | 3.61 | 0.00 | 2.86 |
| 12 | 2.50 | 2.67 | 2.28 | 2.47 | 2.78 | 2.32 | 2.31 | 2.19 | 1.90 | 2.21 | 2.86 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.94 | 0.84 |
| 2 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.97 | 0.76 | 0.84 |
| 3 | 0.78 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.96 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0.77 | 0.84 |
| 4 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.84 |
| 5 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.84 | 0.92 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.83 |
| 6 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.94 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.86 |
| 7 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.96 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.85 |
| 8 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.89 |
| 9 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.87 |
| 10 | 0.80 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.83 |
| 11 | 0.94 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| 12 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013