| Project Name | Mutation2BoundNK |
| Project Name | Mutation2BoundNK |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 143.0 | 119.5 | 92.6 | 70.1 | 67.8 | 61.9 | 51.1 | 48.7 | 41.3 | 33.5 | 25.7 | 21.3 |
| Cluster size | 329 | 244 | 241 | 183 | 180 | 191 | 148 | 148 | 98 | 100 | 71 | 67 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.3 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 3.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.60 | 5.06 | 4.78 | 5.29 | 5.59 | 5.59 | 5.07 | 4.80 | 4.90 | 5.77 | 6.43 | 5.99 |
| GDT_TS | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.57 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 5.27 | 4.86 | 5.33 | 2.20 | 2.98 | 2.51 | 5.24 | 4.89 | 2.81 | 5.75 | 5.82 |
| 2 | 5.27 | 0.00 | 3.04 | 1.76 | 5.70 | 3.55 | 3.62 | 2.64 | 1.11 | 5.50 | 5.18 | 4.11 |
| 3 | 4.86 | 3.04 | 0.00 | 3.14 | 4.98 | 3.27 | 3.33 | 4.32 | 2.90 | 4.82 | 5.18 | 5.00 |
| 4 | 5.33 | 1.76 | 3.14 | 0.00 | 5.82 | 3.53 | 4.05 | 3.08 | 1.91 | 5.39 | 4.61 | 3.86 |
| 5 | 2.20 | 5.70 | 4.98 | 5.82 | 0.00 | 3.67 | 3.27 | 5.19 | 5.26 | 2.00 | 5.55 | 5.87 |
| 6 | 2.98 | 3.55 | 3.27 | 3.53 | 3.67 | 0.00 | 1.96 | 4.06 | 3.48 | 3.54 | 4.46 | 4.23 |
| 7 | 2.51 | 3.62 | 3.33 | 4.05 | 3.27 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 4.28 | 3.43 | 3.73 | 5.36 | 4.84 |
| 8 | 5.24 | 2.64 | 4.32 | 3.08 | 5.19 | 4.06 | 4.28 | 0.00 | 2.52 | 5.04 | 4.89 | 3.92 |
| 9 | 4.89 | 1.11 | 2.90 | 1.91 | 5.26 | 3.48 | 3.43 | 2.52 | 0.00 | 5.05 | 5.13 | 4.30 |
| 10 | 2.81 | 5.50 | 4.82 | 5.39 | 2.00 | 3.54 | 3.73 | 5.04 | 5.05 | 0.00 | 4.93 | 5.73 |
| 11 | 5.75 | 5.18 | 5.18 | 4.61 | 5.55 | 4.46 | 5.36 | 4.89 | 5.13 | 4.93 | 0.00 | 2.57 |
| 12 | 5.82 | 4.11 | 5.00 | 3.86 | 5.87 | 4.23 | 4.84 | 3.92 | 4.30 | 5.73 | 2.57 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.51 | 0.85 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.85 | 0.58 | 0.54 |
| 2 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.89 | 0.48 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.54 | 0.71 | 0.78 |
| 3 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.64 |
| 4 | 0.51 | 0.89 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.52 | 0.73 | 0.76 |
| 5 | 0.85 | 0.48 | 0.61 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.88 | 0.57 | 0.53 |
| 6 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.66 |
| 7 | 0.75 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.70 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.62 |
| 8 | 0.56 | 0.85 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 0.51 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.55 | 0.75 | 0.78 |
| 9 | 0.55 | 0.90 | 0.69 | 0.86 | 0.51 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.78 | 0.79 |
| 10 | 0.85 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.88 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.58 |
| 11 | 0.58 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.85 |
| 12 | 0.54 | 0.78 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.53 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.58 | 0.85 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013