Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 222.6 | 194.3 | 160.6 | 151.7 | 140.2 | 120.6 | 118.3 | 117.3 | 107.9 | 79.8 | 79.1 | 70.2 |
Cluster size | 280 | 258 | 220 | 201 | 180 | 157 | 139 | 140 | 143 | 94 | 106 | 82 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.38 | 2.26 | 2.35 | 2.29 | 2.51 | 2.19 | 2.29 | 2.73 | 2.38 | 2.32 | 3.33 | 2.94 |
GDT_TS | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.10 | 2.30 | 2.13 | 2.30 | 2.04 | 1.89 | 2.34 | 2.35 | 2.18 | 3.62 | 3.10 |
2 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 2.23 | 2.13 | 2.33 | 2.15 | 2.14 | 2.46 | 2.08 | 2.15 | 3.51 | 3.04 |
3 | 2.30 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 2.40 | 2.43 | 2.31 | 2.73 | 2.54 | 2.29 | 3.32 | 3.22 |
4 | 2.13 | 2.13 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 2.21 | 2.27 | 2.37 | 2.09 | 2.37 | 3.51 | 2.60 |
5 | 2.30 | 2.33 | 2.40 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 2.08 | 2.16 | 2.42 | 2.19 | 2.13 | 3.53 | 2.90 |
6 | 2.04 | 2.15 | 2.43 | 2.21 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 1.94 | 2.12 | 2.33 | 1.82 | 3.45 | 3.00 |
7 | 1.89 | 2.14 | 2.31 | 2.27 | 2.16 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 2.16 | 2.19 | 2.09 | 3.63 | 2.93 |
8 | 2.34 | 2.46 | 2.73 | 2.37 | 2.42 | 2.12 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 2.37 | 3.62 | 3.03 |
9 | 2.35 | 2.08 | 2.54 | 2.09 | 2.19 | 2.33 | 2.19 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 3.42 | 2.90 |
10 | 2.18 | 2.15 | 2.29 | 2.37 | 2.13 | 1.82 | 2.09 | 2.37 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 3.43 | 2.98 |
11 | 3.62 | 3.51 | 3.32 | 3.51 | 3.53 | 3.45 | 3.63 | 3.62 | 3.42 | 3.43 | 0.00 | 3.96 |
12 | 3.10 | 3.04 | 3.22 | 2.60 | 2.90 | 3.00 | 2.93 | 3.03 | 2.90 | 2.98 | 3.96 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
2 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
3 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.65 |
4 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.75 |
5 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.71 |
6 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
7 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
8 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.68 |
9 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.71 |
10 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.70 |
11 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.67 |
12 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013