| Project Name | EM85_Lambertson |
| Project Name | EM85_Lambertson |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 126.5 | 113.0 | 97.8 | 97.0 | 70.2 | 57.8 | 57.5 | 41.3 | 40.4 | 36.4 | 33.6 | 22.6 |
| Cluster size | 290 | 275 | 236 | 185 | 187 | 169 | 159 | 93 | 125 | 112 | 113 | 56 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 2.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.31 | 4.45 | 4.20 | 3.76 | 3.54 | 4.79 | 4.64 | 3.63 | 4.95 | 5.04 | 5.41 | 6.33 |
| GDT_TS | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 3.01 | 2.44 | 1.57 | 2.77 | 3.45 | 1.48 | 3.16 | 3.57 | 4.88 | 5.36 |
| 2 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 3.14 | 2.38 | 2.72 | 3.29 | 2.32 | 2.93 | 3.44 | 4.54 | 5.08 |
| 3 | 3.01 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 3.53 | 3.29 | 3.35 | 3.29 | 2.69 | 4.07 | 3.65 | 4.91 | 5.78 |
| 4 | 2.44 | 3.14 | 3.53 | 0.00 | 2.70 | 3.82 | 3.91 | 2.85 | 4.03 | 3.84 | 5.09 | 5.15 |
| 5 | 1.57 | 2.38 | 3.29 | 2.70 | 0.00 | 2.83 | 3.36 | 1.94 | 3.05 | 3.41 | 4.49 | 4.60 |
| 6 | 2.77 | 2.72 | 3.35 | 3.82 | 2.83 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 3.22 | 2.09 | 2.22 | 3.48 | 4.58 |
| 7 | 3.45 | 3.29 | 3.29 | 3.91 | 3.36 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 3.74 | 2.93 | 1.34 | 2.66 | 4.30 |
| 8 | 1.48 | 2.32 | 2.69 | 2.85 | 1.94 | 3.22 | 3.74 | 0.00 | 3.82 | 4.01 | 5.36 | 5.84 |
| 9 | 3.16 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 4.03 | 3.05 | 2.09 | 2.93 | 3.82 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 3.69 | 4.22 |
| 10 | 3.57 | 3.44 | 3.65 | 3.84 | 3.41 | 2.22 | 1.34 | 4.01 | 2.78 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 3.73 |
| 11 | 4.88 | 4.54 | 4.91 | 5.09 | 4.49 | 3.48 | 2.66 | 5.36 | 3.69 | 2.62 | 0.00 | 3.20 |
| 12 | 5.36 | 5.08 | 5.78 | 5.15 | 4.60 | 4.58 | 4.30 | 5.84 | 4.22 | 3.73 | 3.20 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.80 | 0.94 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.91 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.76 |
| 2 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| 3 | 0.67 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.62 |
| 4 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.75 |
| 5 | 0.94 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.76 |
| 6 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.67 |
| 7 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.94 | 0.82 | 0.71 |
| 8 | 0.91 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.66 |
| 10 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.94 | 0.83 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.77 |
| 11 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.71 |
| 12 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013