Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 197.3 | 158.9 | 139.5 | 133.3 | 124.0 | 118.4 | 113.6 | 99.8 | 98.7 | 78.1 | 77.2 | 67.9 |
Cluster size | 270 | 220 | 199 | 194 | 170 | 174 | 173 | 130 | 144 | 119 | 107 | 100 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.17 | 3.27 | 2.86 | 2.69 | 2.85 | 2.60 | 2.92 | 3.06 | 3.46 | 2.74 | 2.58 | 3.07 |
GDT_TS | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.66 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.16 | 2.35 | 2.49 | 2.25 | 2.63 | 2.03 | 2.25 | 1.88 | 2.65 | 2.97 | 2.58 |
2 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 1.94 | 2.43 | 2.12 | 2.56 | 2.08 | 2.07 | 2.02 | 2.36 | 2.60 | 1.95 |
3 | 2.35 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 2.08 | 1.97 | 2.34 | 2.17 | 2.41 | 1.84 | 2.10 | 1.70 |
4 | 2.49 | 2.43 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 2.06 | 1.85 | 2.42 | 2.57 | 2.47 | 2.02 | 2.05 | 2.10 |
5 | 2.25 | 2.12 | 2.08 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 2.42 | 2.07 | 2.29 | 2.30 | 2.36 | 2.42 | 2.31 |
6 | 2.63 | 2.56 | 1.97 | 1.85 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 2.72 | 2.79 | 2.17 | 2.07 | 2.27 |
7 | 2.03 | 2.08 | 2.34 | 2.42 | 2.07 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 2.43 | 2.47 | 2.41 | 2.30 |
8 | 2.25 | 2.07 | 2.17 | 2.57 | 2.29 | 2.72 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 2.27 | 2.95 | 2.41 |
9 | 1.88 | 2.02 | 2.41 | 2.47 | 2.30 | 2.79 | 2.43 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 2.68 | 3.17 | 2.41 |
10 | 2.65 | 2.36 | 1.84 | 2.02 | 2.36 | 2.17 | 2.47 | 2.27 | 2.68 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 2.12 |
11 | 2.97 | 2.60 | 2.10 | 2.05 | 2.42 | 2.07 | 2.41 | 2.95 | 3.17 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 2.40 |
12 | 2.58 | 1.95 | 1.70 | 2.10 | 2.31 | 2.27 | 2.30 | 2.41 | 2.41 | 2.12 | 2.40 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
2 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.78 |
3 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.80 |
4 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.73 |
5 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.70 |
6 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
7 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.73 |
8 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.71 |
9 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.70 |
10 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
11 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.70 |
12 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013