| Project Name | 52mutation |
| Project Name | 52mutation |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 180.1 | 146.7 | 116.7 | 102.9 | 90.5 | 85.5 | 85.4 | 63.9 | 58.0 | 53.6 | 52.2 | 45.3 |
| Cluster size | 357 | 212 | 146 | 141 | 205 | 221 | 205 | 91 | 143 | 134 | 84 | 61 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.68 | 7.44 | 6.91 | 6.87 | 6.22 | 6.43 | 7.45 | 7.68 | 6.06 | 7.43 | 4.49 | 9.91 |
| GDT_TS | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.53 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.67 | 3.35 | 4.06 | 3.44 | 3.18 | 4.15 | 5.41 | 3.44 | 3.94 | 2.18 | 7.41 |
| 2 | 3.67 | 0.00 | 3.17 | 3.99 | 2.75 | 3.48 | 4.09 | 4.85 | 3.48 | 3.60 | 4.24 | 5.71 |
| 3 | 3.35 | 3.17 | 0.00 | 2.21 | 3.66 | 4.95 | 5.46 | 6.75 | 4.09 | 5.09 | 4.61 | 7.73 |
| 4 | 4.06 | 3.99 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 3.86 | 5.92 | 6.58 | 7.07 | 4.32 | 6.13 | 4.97 | 8.01 |
| 5 | 3.44 | 2.75 | 3.66 | 3.86 | 0.00 | 4.37 | 5.40 | 5.62 | 2.00 | 5.03 | 3.09 | 6.83 |
| 6 | 3.18 | 3.48 | 4.95 | 5.92 | 4.37 | 0.00 | 1.55 | 3.49 | 4.56 | 1.45 | 3.60 | 5.42 |
| 7 | 4.15 | 4.09 | 5.46 | 6.58 | 5.40 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 3.45 | 5.46 | 0.87 | 4.70 | 4.96 |
| 8 | 5.41 | 4.85 | 6.75 | 7.07 | 5.62 | 3.49 | 3.45 | 0.00 | 6.05 | 3.55 | 5.34 | 3.36 |
| 9 | 3.44 | 3.48 | 4.09 | 4.32 | 2.00 | 4.56 | 5.46 | 6.05 | 0.00 | 5.16 | 3.28 | 7.32 |
| 10 | 3.94 | 3.60 | 5.09 | 6.13 | 5.03 | 1.45 | 0.87 | 3.55 | 5.16 | 0.00 | 4.53 | 4.87 |
| 11 | 2.18 | 4.24 | 4.61 | 4.97 | 3.09 | 3.60 | 4.70 | 5.34 | 3.28 | 4.53 | 0.00 | 7.34 |
| 12 | 7.41 | 5.71 | 7.73 | 8.01 | 6.83 | 5.42 | 4.96 | 3.36 | 7.32 | 4.87 | 7.34 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.55 |
| 2 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.54 |
| 3 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.45 |
| 4 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.50 |
| 5 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.90 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.61 |
| 6 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.88 | 0.66 | 0.57 |
| 7 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.95 | 0.63 | 0.58 |
| 8 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.90 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.57 |
| 10 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.88 | 0.95 | 0.70 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.59 |
| 11 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.54 |
| 12 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013