| Project Name | Bster1t8h |
| Project Name | Bster1t8h |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 202.2 | 178.8 | 165.6 | 159.3 | 143.6 | 123.4 | 114.8 | 97.1 | 94.6 | 88.5 | 86.8 | 69.2 |
| Cluster size | 272 | 222 | 232 | 210 | 206 | 162 | 156 | 121 | 116 | 113 | 101 | 89 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.36 | 2.39 | 2.23 | 2.59 | 2.19 | 2.47 | 2.24 | 2.43 | 2.57 | 2.55 | 2.52 | 2.55 |
| GDT_TS | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.70 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.72 | 2.16 | 2.36 | 2.14 | 1.85 | 2.74 | 2.10 | 2.06 | 2.01 | 2.04 | 2.22 |
| 2 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 2.32 | 2.14 | 1.88 | 2.82 | 2.00 | 1.92 | 1.96 | 1.91 | 2.10 |
| 3 | 2.16 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 1.84 | 2.42 | 2.27 | 2.47 | 2.14 | 2.24 | 2.26 | 2.38 |
| 4 | 2.36 | 2.32 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 2.18 | 2.53 | 2.55 | 2.44 | 2.18 | 2.38 | 2.56 | 2.31 |
| 5 | 2.14 | 2.14 | 1.84 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 2.31 | 2.17 | 2.28 | 2.08 | 2.25 | 2.27 | 2.30 |
| 6 | 1.85 | 1.88 | 2.42 | 2.53 | 2.31 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 2.01 | 2.11 | 1.97 | 2.06 | 2.23 |
| 7 | 2.74 | 2.82 | 2.27 | 2.55 | 2.17 | 2.78 | 0.00 | 2.76 | 2.68 | 2.80 | 2.99 | 2.86 |
| 8 | 2.10 | 2.00 | 2.47 | 2.44 | 2.28 | 2.01 | 2.76 | 0.00 | 2.17 | 2.23 | 2.29 | 2.49 |
| 9 | 2.06 | 1.92 | 2.14 | 2.18 | 2.08 | 2.11 | 2.68 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 1.83 | 2.08 | 2.05 |
| 10 | 2.01 | 1.96 | 2.24 | 2.38 | 2.25 | 1.97 | 2.80 | 2.23 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 1.98 |
| 11 | 2.04 | 1.91 | 2.26 | 2.56 | 2.27 | 2.06 | 2.99 | 2.29 | 2.08 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 2.45 |
| 12 | 2.22 | 2.10 | 2.38 | 2.31 | 2.30 | 2.23 | 2.86 | 2.49 | 2.05 | 1.98 | 2.45 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.74 |
| 2 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.76 |
| 3 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| 4 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.74 |
| 5 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.74 |
| 6 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.74 |
| 7 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.73 |
| 8 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.72 |
| 9 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.76 |
| 10 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.76 |
| 11 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
| 12 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013