| Project Name | Jess_Control1 |
| Project Name | Jess_Control1 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 102.2 | 100.9 | 88.5 | 79.1 | 63.2 | 62.1 | 62.0 | 61.0 | 60.7 | 46.7 | 33.3 | 33.1 |
| Cluster size | 241 | 278 | 173 | 175 | 145 | 169 | 170 | 180 | 179 | 118 | 87 | 85 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.4 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.6 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.10 | 5.03 | 4.64 | 4.35 | 7.12 | 4.44 | 5.51 | 5.65 | 6.24 | 6.85 | 4.20 | 5.20 |
| GDT_TS | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.56 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.77 | 5.49 | 3.60 | 7.86 | 3.92 | 3.86 | 4.26 | 7.24 | 5.91 | 2.66 | 5.66 |
| 2 | 3.77 | 0.00 | 4.86 | 4.66 | 5.73 | 4.55 | 2.37 | 5.16 | 4.89 | 6.00 | 4.11 | 4.96 |
| 3 | 5.49 | 4.86 | 0.00 | 6.26 | 6.70 | 5.82 | 5.05 | 6.86 | 6.07 | 7.69 | 5.78 | 2.72 |
| 4 | 3.60 | 4.66 | 6.26 | 0.00 | 7.48 | 2.36 | 4.88 | 3.90 | 6.55 | 5.09 | 2.22 | 6.75 |
| 5 | 7.86 | 5.73 | 6.70 | 7.48 | 0.00 | 6.66 | 5.25 | 5.59 | 1.72 | 4.60 | 7.09 | 5.99 |
| 6 | 3.92 | 4.55 | 5.82 | 2.36 | 6.66 | 0.00 | 4.41 | 3.27 | 5.85 | 4.30 | 2.56 | 6.03 |
| 7 | 3.86 | 2.37 | 5.05 | 4.88 | 5.25 | 4.41 | 0.00 | 4.14 | 4.76 | 5.15 | 4.16 | 4.37 |
| 8 | 4.26 | 5.16 | 6.86 | 3.90 | 5.59 | 3.27 | 4.14 | 0.00 | 5.29 | 2.85 | 3.47 | 6.19 |
| 9 | 7.24 | 4.89 | 6.07 | 6.55 | 1.72 | 5.85 | 4.76 | 5.29 | 0.00 | 4.42 | 6.28 | 5.84 |
| 10 | 5.91 | 6.00 | 7.69 | 5.09 | 4.60 | 4.30 | 5.15 | 2.85 | 4.42 | 0.00 | 4.86 | 7.20 |
| 11 | 2.66 | 4.11 | 5.78 | 2.22 | 7.09 | 2.56 | 4.16 | 3.47 | 6.28 | 4.86 | 0.00 | 6.06 |
| 12 | 5.66 | 4.96 | 2.72 | 6.75 | 5.99 | 6.03 | 4.37 | 6.19 | 5.84 | 7.20 | 6.06 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.70 |
| 2 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.86 | 0.54 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.62 |
| 3 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.77 |
| 4 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.85 | 0.47 | 0.84 | 0.60 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.61 |
| 5 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.95 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.73 |
| 6 | 0.63 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.85 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.47 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.60 |
| 7 | 0.68 | 0.86 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.62 | 0.47 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.64 |
| 8 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.84 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.59 |
| 9 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.95 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.71 |
| 10 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.53 | 0.82 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.60 |
| 11 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.73 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.56 |
| 12 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.77 | 0.61 | 0.73 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013