| Project Name | DR1 |
| Project Name | DR1 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 145.7 | 73.1 | 68.6 | 68.4 | 64.9 | 63.9 | 63.8 | 60.2 | 57.1 | 51.1 | 42.6 | 29.2 |
| Cluster size | 362 | 205 | 174 | 193 | 184 | 154 | 121 | 142 | 126 | 140 | 104 | 95 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 3.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.57 | 3.21 | 3.59 | 3.33 | 3.46 | 3.09 | 5.51 | 4.62 | 6.28 | 3.02 | 5.58 | 4.26 |
| GDT_TS | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.67 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.97 | 3.41 | 2.06 | 3.72 | 2.26 | 5.18 | 3.94 | 4.96 | 2.52 | 5.20 | 4.53 |
| 2 | 2.97 | 0.00 | 3.28 | 2.82 | 3.02 | 3.21 | 4.47 | 4.14 | 4.47 | 1.44 | 5.37 | 4.11 |
| 3 | 3.41 | 3.28 | 0.00 | 2.98 | 1.88 | 3.69 | 5.39 | 1.86 | 5.33 | 3.57 | 3.53 | 3.07 |
| 4 | 2.06 | 2.82 | 2.98 | 0.00 | 3.02 | 2.84 | 5.88 | 3.40 | 5.62 | 2.54 | 4.66 | 3.89 |
| 5 | 3.72 | 3.02 | 1.88 | 3.02 | 0.00 | 3.69 | 5.04 | 2.55 | 4.96 | 3.49 | 3.60 | 3.49 |
| 6 | 2.26 | 3.21 | 3.69 | 2.84 | 3.69 | 0.00 | 5.06 | 4.60 | 5.48 | 2.45 | 6.09 | 4.75 |
| 7 | 5.18 | 4.47 | 5.39 | 5.88 | 5.04 | 5.06 | 0.00 | 6.38 | 2.35 | 4.40 | 7.16 | 6.04 |
| 8 | 3.94 | 4.14 | 1.86 | 3.40 | 2.55 | 4.60 | 6.38 | 0.00 | 5.88 | 4.47 | 2.48 | 2.95 |
| 9 | 4.96 | 4.47 | 5.33 | 5.62 | 4.96 | 5.48 | 2.35 | 5.88 | 0.00 | 4.53 | 6.57 | 6.09 |
| 10 | 2.52 | 1.44 | 3.57 | 2.54 | 3.49 | 2.45 | 4.40 | 4.47 | 4.53 | 0.00 | 5.89 | 4.27 |
| 11 | 5.20 | 5.37 | 3.53 | 4.66 | 3.60 | 6.09 | 7.16 | 2.48 | 6.57 | 5.89 | 0.00 | 3.46 |
| 12 | 4.53 | 4.11 | 3.07 | 3.89 | 3.49 | 4.75 | 6.04 | 2.95 | 6.09 | 4.27 | 3.46 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.64 | 0.83 | 0.65 | 0.80 | 0.64 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.78 |
| 2 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.91 | 0.76 | 0.75 |
| 3 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.60 | 0.89 | 0.59 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.76 |
| 4 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.76 |
| 5 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.67 |
| 6 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.81 | 0.60 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.78 |
| 7 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.70 |
| 8 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.76 |
| 9 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.81 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.58 | 0.68 |
| 10 | 0.80 | 0.91 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.82 |
| 11 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.88 | 0.62 | 0.85 | 0.58 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.79 |
| 12 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013