Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 211.6 | 184.9 | 173.6 | 142.2 | 123.0 | 108.6 | 99.5 | 94.4 | 81.3 | 75.8 | 70.5 | 41.1 |
Cluster size | 302 | 268 | 249 | 206 | 169 | 156 | 140 | 133 | 108 | 114 | 105 | 50 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.2 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.09 | 2.99 | 3.03 | 2.84 | 3.11 | 3.16 | 2.80 | 3.05 | 2.97 | 3.05 | 2.44 | 3.04 |
GDT_TS | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.62 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 1.85 | 2.42 | 1.91 | 1.87 | 2.40 | 2.41 | 2.17 | 1.73 | 2.48 | 2.08 |
2 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 1.72 | 2.28 | 2.00 | 1.78 | 2.31 | 2.17 | 1.89 | 2.00 | 2.44 | 2.23 |
3 | 1.85 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 2.44 | 1.98 | 1.83 | 2.37 | 2.29 | 2.08 | 1.73 | 2.56 | 2.27 |
4 | 2.42 | 2.28 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 2.25 | 2.47 | 1.81 | 1.65 | 2.38 | 2.27 | 2.13 | 2.61 |
5 | 1.91 | 2.00 | 1.98 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 2.10 | 2.21 | 2.30 | 1.81 | 1.99 | 2.50 | 2.12 |
6 | 1.87 | 1.78 | 1.83 | 2.47 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 2.45 | 2.32 | 2.11 | 1.87 | 2.68 | 2.34 |
7 | 2.40 | 2.31 | 2.37 | 1.81 | 2.21 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 2.08 | 2.39 | 2.12 | 2.05 | 2.68 |
8 | 2.41 | 2.17 | 2.29 | 1.65 | 2.30 | 2.32 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 2.30 | 2.24 | 2.60 |
9 | 2.17 | 1.89 | 2.08 | 2.38 | 1.81 | 2.11 | 2.39 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 2.16 | 2.45 | 2.35 |
10 | 1.73 | 2.00 | 1.73 | 2.27 | 1.99 | 1.87 | 2.12 | 2.30 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 2.54 | 2.31 |
11 | 2.48 | 2.44 | 2.56 | 2.13 | 2.50 | 2.68 | 2.05 | 2.24 | 2.45 | 2.54 | 0.00 | 2.63 |
12 | 2.08 | 2.23 | 2.27 | 2.61 | 2.12 | 2.34 | 2.68 | 2.60 | 2.35 | 2.31 | 2.63 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.74 |
2 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.76 |
3 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.71 |
4 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.69 |
5 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.76 |
6 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.71 |
7 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.72 |
8 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.69 |
9 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
10 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.72 |
11 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.70 |
12 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013