Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 234.5 | 188.9 | 186.8 | 185.1 | 169.4 | 167.1 | 158.7 | 136.2 | 133.3 | 114.3 | 78.1 | 40.0 |
Cluster size | 260 | 207 | 211 | 206 | 184 | 182 | 177 | 161 | 147 | 123 | 101 | 41 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.0 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.47 | 3.64 | 3.98 | 3.30 | 3.36 | 3.80 | 3.51 | 3.23 | 3.53 | 3.57 | 2.45 | 2.51 |
GDT_TS | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 2.73 | 1.98 | 1.91 | 2.04 | 1.99 | 2.33 | 1.93 | 2.03 | 2.91 | 3.65 |
2 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 3.07 | 2.09 | 2.28 | 2.39 | 2.10 | 2.73 | 2.46 | 2.08 | 3.30 | 3.73 |
3 | 2.73 | 3.07 | 0.00 | 3.11 | 2.87 | 2.90 | 2.90 | 2.96 | 2.86 | 2.76 | 3.43 | 4.25 |
4 | 1.98 | 2.09 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 2.11 | 2.36 | 2.00 | 2.27 | 2.20 | 2.18 | 2.90 | 3.47 |
5 | 1.91 | 2.28 | 2.87 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 1.99 | 1.98 | 1.81 | 2.10 | 2.87 | 3.47 |
6 | 2.04 | 2.39 | 2.90 | 2.36 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 1.87 | 2.41 | 1.94 | 1.88 | 3.46 | 4.02 |
7 | 1.99 | 2.10 | 2.90 | 2.00 | 1.99 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 1.83 | 1.93 | 3.24 | 3.72 |
8 | 2.33 | 2.73 | 2.96 | 2.27 | 1.98 | 2.41 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 2.23 | 2.69 | 3.63 |
9 | 1.93 | 2.46 | 2.86 | 2.20 | 1.81 | 1.94 | 1.83 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 2.12 | 3.16 | 3.73 |
10 | 2.03 | 2.08 | 2.76 | 2.18 | 2.10 | 1.88 | 1.93 | 2.23 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 3.23 | 3.76 |
11 | 2.91 | 3.30 | 3.43 | 2.90 | 2.87 | 3.46 | 3.24 | 2.69 | 3.16 | 3.23 | 0.00 | 2.46 |
12 | 3.65 | 3.73 | 4.25 | 3.47 | 3.47 | 4.02 | 3.72 | 3.63 | 3.73 | 3.76 | 2.46 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
2 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.67 |
3 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.68 |
4 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.66 |
5 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.71 |
6 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.68 |
7 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
8 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.65 |
9 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.68 |
10 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
11 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
12 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013