| Project Name | N49Scontrol |
| Project Name | N49Scontrol |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 160.3 | 147.4 | 147.3 | 145.4 | 140.4 | 119.0 | 110.3 | 101.7 | 99.2 | 65.5 | 63.5 | 29.2 |
| Cluster size | 210 | 230 | 211 | 242 | 215 | 158 | 110 | 177 | 176 | 64 | 139 | 68 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 2.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.72 | 2.73 | 4.18 | 5.03 | 3.69 | 3.18 | 3.39 | 3.57 | 2.92 | 4.19 | 4.04 | 3.43 |
| GDT_TS | 0.55 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 5.20 | 2.31 | 1.27 | 4.18 | 3.73 | 5.60 | 4.82 | 4.04 | 6.19 | 2.28 | 3.90 |
| 2 | 5.20 | 0.00 | 3.58 | 4.96 | 2.56 | 2.46 | 2.22 | 1.93 | 1.76 | 3.68 | 3.74 | 2.26 |
| 3 | 2.31 | 3.58 | 0.00 | 1.76 | 2.60 | 2.21 | 4.07 | 2.98 | 2.47 | 4.94 | 1.22 | 2.28 |
| 4 | 1.27 | 4.96 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 3.63 | 3.26 | 5.34 | 4.28 | 3.60 | 6.11 | 2.00 | 3.47 |
| 5 | 4.18 | 2.56 | 2.60 | 3.63 | 0.00 | 1.37 | 3.09 | 2.09 | 1.65 | 4.64 | 2.86 | 2.19 |
| 6 | 3.73 | 2.46 | 2.21 | 3.26 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 3.05 | 1.98 | 1.45 | 4.44 | 2.40 | 1.95 |
| 7 | 5.60 | 2.22 | 4.07 | 5.34 | 3.09 | 3.05 | 0.00 | 1.77 | 2.61 | 2.12 | 4.61 | 3.10 |
| 8 | 4.82 | 1.93 | 2.98 | 4.28 | 2.09 | 1.98 | 1.77 | 0.00 | 1.69 | 3.02 | 3.42 | 2.17 |
| 9 | 4.04 | 1.76 | 2.47 | 3.60 | 1.65 | 1.45 | 2.61 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 4.07 | 2.61 | 1.59 |
| 10 | 6.19 | 3.68 | 4.94 | 6.11 | 4.64 | 4.44 | 2.12 | 3.02 | 4.07 | 0.00 | 5.56 | 4.25 |
| 11 | 2.28 | 3.74 | 1.22 | 2.00 | 2.86 | 2.40 | 4.61 | 3.42 | 2.61 | 5.56 | 0.00 | 2.62 |
| 12 | 3.90 | 2.26 | 2.28 | 3.47 | 2.19 | 1.95 | 3.10 | 2.17 | 1.59 | 4.25 | 2.62 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.91 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.53 | 0.77 | 0.69 |
| 2 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.83 |
| 3 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.62 | 0.88 | 0.76 |
| 4 | 0.91 | 0.58 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.78 | 0.66 |
| 5 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 0.87 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.79 |
| 6 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.64 | 0.85 | 0.83 |
| 7 | 0.63 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.65 | 0.73 |
| 8 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.81 |
| 9 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.73 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 0.92 |
| 10 | 0.53 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.64 |
| 11 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.65 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.74 |
| 12 | 0.69 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013