| Project Name | 14 |
| Project Name | 14 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 388.5 | 374.6 | 354.6 | 341.3 | 317.9 | 209.6 | 195.0 | 113.4 | 106.5 | 96.7 | 48.5 | 28.5 |
| Cluster size | 279 | 273 | 257 | 249 | 239 | 168 | 170 | 90 | 108 | 80 | 56 | 31 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 0.71 | 0.95 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.84 | 1.69 | 1.17 | 1.11 | 2.03 | 1.57 |
| GDT_TS | 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.92 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.67 | 0.42 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.54 | 1.46 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 1.78 | 1.42 |
| 2 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.59 | 0.93 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 1.57 | 0.90 | 1.09 | 1.86 | 1.41 |
| 3 | 0.42 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 1.49 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 1.79 | 1.51 |
| 4 | 0.56 | 0.93 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 0.88 | 0.59 | 1.48 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 1.73 | 1.59 |
| 5 | 0.62 | 0.83 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.72 | 1.62 | 1.06 | 1.07 | 1.90 | 1.60 |
| 6 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 1.72 | 1.19 | 1.21 | 2.00 | 1.62 |
| 7 | 0.54 | 0.81 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 1.40 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 1.70 | 1.45 |
| 8 | 1.46 | 1.57 | 1.49 | 1.48 | 1.62 | 1.72 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 1.37 | 1.44 | 0.63 | 1.96 |
| 9 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 1.06 | 1.19 | 0.74 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 1.55 | 1.48 |
| 10 | 0.77 | 1.09 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 1.07 | 1.21 | 0.71 | 1.44 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.77 | 1.64 |
| 11 | 1.78 | 1.86 | 1.79 | 1.73 | 1.90 | 2.00 | 1.70 | 0.63 | 1.55 | 1.77 | 0.00 | 2.19 |
| 12 | 1.42 | 1.41 | 1.51 | 1.59 | 1.60 | 1.62 | 1.45 | 1.96 | 1.48 | 1.64 | 2.19 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.97 |
| 2 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.93 |
| 3 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| 4 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| 5 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.93 |
| 6 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.92 |
| 7 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| 8 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.94 |
| 9 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| 10 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.94 |
| 11 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.93 |
| 12 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013