| Project Name | Bhlak8_1RFM5 |
| Project Name | Bhlak8_1RFM5 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 203.4 | 199.8 | 179.5 | 168.5 | 143.8 | 143.6 | 128.9 | 117.9 | 96.6 | 93.7 | 88.3 | 57.9 |
| Cluster size | 240 | 239 | 225 | 207 | 162 | 188 | 152 | 160 | 131 | 118 | 114 | 64 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.51 | 2.39 | 2.54 | 2.64 | 2.82 | 2.33 | 2.53 | 2.34 | 2.57 | 2.71 | 2.25 | 2.54 |
| GDT_TS | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.71 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.93 | 2.32 | 2.33 | 2.04 | 2.23 | 1.94 | 2.32 | 1.89 | 2.15 | 2.32 | 2.24 |
| 2 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 2.48 | 2.42 | 2.30 | 2.06 | 1.95 | 2.23 | 1.98 | 2.45 | 1.82 | 2.24 |
| 3 | 2.32 | 2.48 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 2.09 | 2.55 | 2.37 | 2.46 | 2.21 | 2.18 | 2.71 | 2.19 |
| 4 | 2.33 | 2.42 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 2.47 | 2.30 | 2.49 | 2.37 | 1.87 | 2.36 | 1.80 |
| 5 | 2.04 | 2.30 | 2.09 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 2.49 | 2.23 | 2.44 | 2.11 | 1.80 | 2.48 | 2.08 |
| 6 | 2.23 | 2.06 | 2.55 | 2.47 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 2.09 | 2.20 | 2.46 | 1.91 | 2.37 |
| 7 | 1.94 | 1.95 | 2.37 | 2.30 | 2.23 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 2.23 | 2.04 | 2.20 | 2.13 |
| 8 | 2.32 | 2.23 | 2.46 | 2.49 | 2.44 | 2.09 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 2.35 | 2.09 | 2.59 |
| 9 | 1.89 | 1.98 | 2.21 | 2.37 | 2.11 | 2.20 | 2.23 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 2.23 | 2.34 | 2.31 |
| 10 | 2.15 | 2.45 | 2.18 | 1.87 | 1.80 | 2.46 | 2.04 | 2.35 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 2.37 | 2.00 |
| 11 | 2.32 | 1.82 | 2.71 | 2.36 | 2.48 | 1.91 | 2.20 | 2.09 | 2.34 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 2.32 |
| 12 | 2.24 | 2.24 | 2.19 | 1.80 | 2.08 | 2.37 | 2.13 | 2.59 | 2.31 | 2.00 | 2.32 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.72 |
| 2 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.71 |
| 3 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.74 |
| 4 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.79 |
| 5 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.73 |
| 6 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.71 |
| 7 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.76 |
| 8 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.66 |
| 9 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.73 |
| 10 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.76 |
| 11 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
| 12 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013