| Project Name | T45A |
| Project Name | T45A |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 511.6 | 485.0 | 355.7 | 314.0 | 296.3 | 181.0 | 151.9 | 145.6 | 124.8 | 124.5 | 97.8 | 55.7 |
| Cluster size | 314 | 335 | 258 | 237 | 222 | 116 | 122 | 106 | 98 | 85 | 68 | 39 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 8.04 | 8.64 | 8.42 | 8.24 | 8.08 | 8.39 | 7.75 | 7.66 | 8.03 | 8.56 | 8.72 | 8.82 |
| GDT_TS | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.49 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.82 | 0.93 | 1.09 | 1.22 | 0.81 | 1.06 | 2.37 | 2.43 | 1.46 |
| 2 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0.96 | 1.05 | 1.02 | 1.51 | 1.36 | 1.25 | 2.35 | 2.31 | 0.99 |
| 3 | 0.94 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 1.06 | 0.85 | 1.27 | 1.16 | 1.27 | 1.32 | 2.58 | 2.53 | 1.20 |
| 4 | 0.82 | 0.96 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.11 | 0.78 | 1.41 | 0.82 | 0.72 | 2.24 | 2.37 | 1.05 |
| 5 | 0.93 | 1.05 | 0.85 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 1.55 | 0.66 | 0.99 | 1.18 | 2.63 | 2.72 | 1.47 |
| 6 | 1.09 | 1.02 | 1.27 | 0.78 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 1.89 | 1.26 | 0.99 | 2.19 | 2.30 | 1.13 |
| 7 | 1.22 | 1.51 | 1.16 | 1.41 | 0.66 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 1.08 | 1.48 | 2.96 | 3.03 | 1.84 |
| 8 | 0.81 | 1.36 | 1.27 | 0.82 | 0.99 | 1.26 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 2.41 | 2.58 | 1.55 |
| 9 | 1.06 | 1.25 | 1.32 | 0.72 | 1.18 | 0.99 | 1.48 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 2.10 | 2.34 | 1.25 |
| 10 | 2.37 | 2.35 | 2.58 | 2.24 | 2.63 | 2.19 | 2.96 | 2.41 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 0.97 | 1.98 |
| 11 | 2.43 | 2.31 | 2.53 | 2.37 | 2.72 | 2.30 | 3.03 | 2.58 | 2.34 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 2.06 |
| 12 | 1.46 | 0.99 | 1.20 | 1.05 | 1.47 | 1.13 | 1.84 | 1.55 | 1.25 | 1.98 | 2.06 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.83 |
| 2 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.94 |
| 3 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.88 |
| 4 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.91 |
| 5 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.84 |
| 6 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.90 |
| 7 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.99 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.82 |
| 8 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.88 |
| 9 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.85 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.91 |
| 10 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.84 |
| 11 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.86 |
| 12 | 0.83 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013