| Project Name | 51bmutation |
| Project Name | 51bmutation |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 217.3 | 162.3 | 137.1 | 134.5 | 118.9 | 105.2 | 101.4 | 101.1 | 68.3 | 51.4 | 43.9 | 39.3 |
| Cluster size | 302 | 209 | 203 | 275 | 218 | 131 | 155 | 129 | 98 | 110 | 116 | 54 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 1.4 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.67 | 3.93 | 6.31 | 5.41 | 4.76 | 7.34 | 4.77 | 8.78 | 9.11 | 4.32 | 5.31 | 9.27 |
| GDT_TS | 0.46 | 0.66 | 0.41 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.41 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 4.29 | 1.58 | 5.53 | 5.52 | 3.12 | 3.08 | 4.22 | 4.88 | 2.63 | 5.20 | 4.79 |
| 2 | 4.29 | 0.00 | 5.29 | 4.30 | 3.80 | 6.83 | 2.55 | 8.13 | 8.58 | 3.21 | 4.24 | 8.56 |
| 3 | 1.58 | 5.29 | 0.00 | 6.10 | 6.26 | 2.29 | 3.90 | 3.40 | 4.07 | 3.44 | 5.59 | 4.00 |
| 4 | 5.53 | 4.30 | 6.10 | 0.00 | 1.55 | 6.81 | 4.44 | 8.12 | 8.04 | 5.11 | 2.38 | 8.08 |
| 5 | 5.52 | 3.80 | 6.26 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 7.02 | 4.37 | 8.51 | 8.46 | 4.79 | 2.57 | 8.56 |
| 6 | 3.12 | 6.83 | 2.29 | 6.81 | 7.02 | 0.00 | 5.70 | 2.29 | 2.45 | 4.89 | 6.18 | 2.55 |
| 7 | 3.08 | 2.55 | 3.90 | 4.44 | 4.37 | 5.70 | 0.00 | 6.82 | 7.38 | 2.60 | 4.43 | 7.25 |
| 8 | 4.22 | 8.13 | 3.40 | 8.12 | 8.51 | 2.29 | 6.82 | 0.00 | 1.80 | 6.12 | 7.56 | 1.68 |
| 9 | 4.88 | 8.58 | 4.07 | 8.04 | 8.46 | 2.45 | 7.38 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 6.61 | 7.43 | 1.07 |
| 10 | 2.63 | 3.21 | 3.44 | 5.11 | 4.79 | 4.89 | 2.60 | 6.12 | 6.61 | 0.00 | 4.65 | 6.71 |
| 11 | 5.20 | 4.24 | 5.59 | 2.38 | 2.57 | 6.18 | 4.43 | 7.56 | 7.43 | 4.65 | 0.00 | 7.49 |
| 12 | 4.79 | 8.56 | 4.00 | 8.08 | 8.56 | 2.55 | 7.25 | 1.68 | 1.07 | 6.71 | 7.49 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.83 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.60 | 0.75 |
| 2 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.55 | 0.72 | 0.50 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.54 |
| 3 | 0.83 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.73 |
| 4 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.79 | 0.49 |
| 5 | 0.58 | 0.66 | 0.54 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.79 | 0.53 |
| 6 | 0.75 | 0.55 | 0.78 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.74 |
| 7 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.77 | 0.63 | 0.61 |
| 8 | 0.69 | 0.50 | 0.69 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.85 |
| 9 | 0.72 | 0.56 | 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.79 | 0.59 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.91 |
| 10 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.77 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.60 |
| 11 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.57 |
| 12 | 0.75 | 0.54 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013