| Project Name | zzyy |
| Project Name | zzyy |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 238.6 | 195.8 | 149.8 | 139.4 | 126.7 | 125.9 | 122.5 | 113.8 | 107.0 | 91.9 | 84.9 | 74.0 |
| Cluster size | 291 | 258 | 199 | 201 | 143 | 126 | 157 | 151 | 147 | 99 | 144 | 84 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 8.25 | 6.40 | 6.99 | 5.23 | 8.58 | 5.85 | 7.37 | 6.06 | 5.15 | 7.40 | 4.58 | 8.75 |
| GDT_TS | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.42 | 0.55 | 0.45 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.64 | 0.42 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 4.38 | 3.23 | 4.21 | 0.93 | 3.68 | 1.65 | 4.70 | 5.83 | 3.12 | 5.87 | 1.06 |
| 2 | 4.38 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 1.94 | 4.58 | 2.66 | 3.44 | 2.30 | 3.61 | 3.34 | 3.82 | 4.91 |
| 3 | 3.23 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 2.11 | 3.47 | 1.54 | 2.76 | 2.88 | 4.37 | 1.36 | 4.40 | 3.65 |
| 4 | 4.21 | 1.94 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 4.51 | 1.54 | 3.44 | 2.19 | 3.39 | 2.91 | 3.12 | 4.76 |
| 5 | 0.93 | 4.58 | 3.47 | 4.51 | 0.00 | 3.94 | 2.02 | 4.84 | 6.09 | 3.33 | 6.18 | 0.91 |
| 6 | 3.68 | 2.66 | 1.54 | 1.54 | 3.94 | 0.00 | 3.17 | 2.78 | 3.74 | 2.06 | 3.67 | 4.08 |
| 7 | 1.65 | 3.44 | 2.76 | 3.44 | 2.02 | 3.17 | 0.00 | 4.06 | 5.01 | 2.99 | 5.10 | 2.30 |
| 8 | 4.70 | 2.30 | 2.88 | 2.19 | 4.84 | 2.78 | 4.06 | 0.00 | 3.57 | 3.42 | 3.59 | 5.04 |
| 9 | 5.83 | 3.61 | 4.37 | 3.39 | 6.09 | 3.74 | 5.01 | 3.57 | 0.00 | 4.89 | 3.20 | 6.22 |
| 10 | 3.12 | 3.34 | 1.36 | 2.91 | 3.33 | 2.06 | 2.99 | 3.42 | 4.89 | 0.00 | 4.87 | 3.41 |
| 11 | 5.87 | 3.82 | 4.40 | 3.12 | 6.18 | 3.67 | 5.10 | 3.59 | 3.20 | 4.87 | 0.00 | 6.30 |
| 12 | 1.06 | 4.91 | 3.65 | 4.76 | 0.91 | 4.08 | 2.30 | 5.04 | 6.22 | 3.41 | 6.30 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.94 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 0.52 | 0.41 | 0.65 | 0.39 | 0.91 |
| 2 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.54 | 0.74 | 0.62 | 0.83 | 0.58 | 0.76 | 0.55 | 0.54 |
| 3 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.63 | 0.86 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.54 | 0.88 | 0.54 | 0.59 |
| 4 | 0.56 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.85 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 0.61 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.55 |
| 5 | 0.94 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.75 | 0.52 | 0.41 | 0.64 | 0.38 | 0.93 |
| 6 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.59 | 0.78 | 0.61 | 0.55 |
| 7 | 0.79 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.45 | 0.69 | 0.45 | 0.75 |
| 8 | 0.52 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.52 | 0.74 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.53 |
| 9 | 0.41 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 0.41 | 0.59 | 0.45 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.74 | 0.40 |
| 10 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.88 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.64 |
| 11 | 0.39 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.38 | 0.61 | 0.45 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.37 |
| 12 | 0.91 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.93 | 0.55 | 0.75 | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.64 | 0.37 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013