| Project Name | Kirsten_V2 |
| Project Name | Kirsten_V2 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 223.8 | 208.2 | 132.4 | 127.5 | 123.7 | 113.7 | 104.9 | 90.3 | 76.4 | 59.5 | 58.9 | 58.5 |
| Cluster size | 325 | 285 | 189 | 155 | 224 | 162 | 158 | 171 | 65 | 122 | 86 | 58 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.85 | 3.42 | 2.72 | 3.49 | 3.06 | 2.52 | 3.18 | 2.62 | 5.11 | 2.95 | 2.95 | 3.69 |
| GDT_TS | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.51 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.63 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.09 | 3.48 | 1.69 | 4.01 | 4.03 | 2.79 | 3.31 | 6.24 | 4.55 | 3.22 | 4.19 |
| 2 | 2.09 | 0.00 | 2.86 | 2.00 | 4.15 | 4.25 | 1.71 | 2.72 | 6.76 | 4.69 | 2.71 | 3.20 |
| 3 | 3.48 | 2.86 | 0.00 | 3.64 | 3.11 | 2.75 | 2.05 | 1.04 | 4.91 | 2.87 | 1.92 | 1.73 |
| 4 | 1.69 | 2.00 | 3.64 | 0.00 | 4.60 | 4.61 | 2.73 | 3.36 | 6.75 | 5.18 | 3.31 | 4.08 |
| 5 | 4.01 | 4.15 | 3.11 | 4.60 | 0.00 | 1.36 | 4.29 | 2.88 | 3.09 | 1.96 | 3.82 | 3.83 |
| 6 | 4.03 | 4.25 | 2.75 | 4.61 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 4.10 | 2.60 | 3.12 | 1.42 | 3.70 | 3.46 |
| 7 | 2.79 | 1.71 | 2.05 | 2.73 | 4.29 | 4.10 | 0.00 | 2.11 | 6.24 | 4.39 | 2.08 | 2.41 |
| 8 | 3.31 | 2.72 | 1.04 | 3.36 | 2.88 | 2.60 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 5.05 | 3.03 | 2.24 | 1.72 |
| 9 | 6.24 | 6.76 | 4.91 | 6.75 | 3.09 | 3.12 | 6.24 | 5.05 | 0.00 | 3.17 | 6.14 | 4.70 |
| 10 | 4.55 | 4.69 | 2.87 | 5.18 | 1.96 | 1.42 | 4.39 | 3.03 | 3.17 | 0.00 | 3.69 | 3.47 |
| 11 | 3.22 | 2.71 | 1.92 | 3.31 | 3.82 | 3.70 | 2.08 | 2.24 | 6.14 | 3.69 | 0.00 | 2.99 |
| 12 | 4.19 | 3.20 | 1.73 | 4.08 | 3.83 | 3.46 | 2.41 | 1.72 | 4.70 | 3.47 | 2.99 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.61 | 0.80 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.46 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.63 |
| 2 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.41 | 0.48 | 0.67 | 0.65 |
| 3 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.91 | 0.51 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 0.90 |
| 4 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.43 | 0.51 | 0.62 | 0.61 |
| 5 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.82 | 0.64 | 0.56 |
| 6 | 0.58 | 0.51 | 0.72 | 0.55 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.87 | 0.66 | 0.60 |
| 7 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.74 | 0.75 |
| 8 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.91 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.67 | 0.80 | 0.86 |
| 9 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.43 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.48 | 0.46 |
| 10 | 0.55 | 0.48 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.82 | 0.87 | 0.51 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.61 |
| 11 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.79 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.48 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 12 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.90 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.46 | 0.61 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013