| Project Name | F1 |
| Project Name | F1 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 159.6 | 133.9 | 129.4 | 127.8 | 124.6 | 124.1 | 103.2 | 93.8 | 82.7 | 53.3 | 52.5 | 25.0 |
| Cluster size | 251 | 239 | 231 | 205 | 210 | 203 | 168 | 157 | 134 | 74 | 84 | 44 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.52 | 4.75 | 4.62 | 4.31 | 5.36 | 5.14 | 5.42 | 4.39 | 4.07 | 4.25 | 4.99 | 5.28 |
| GDT_TS | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.53 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.92 | 3.50 | 4.73 | 4.21 | 5.58 | 2.74 | 5.49 | 5.81 | 4.35 | 5.43 | 5.08 |
| 2 | 3.92 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 3.78 | 3.16 | 3.82 | 3.23 | 3.82 | 4.35 | 3.39 | 3.57 | 3.49 |
| 3 | 3.50 | 2.78 | 0.00 | 3.12 | 3.54 | 4.19 | 3.24 | 3.60 | 4.18 | 3.05 | 3.98 | 3.88 |
| 4 | 4.73 | 3.78 | 3.12 | 0.00 | 4.58 | 4.55 | 4.71 | 2.96 | 4.43 | 3.90 | 4.63 | 4.64 |
| 5 | 4.21 | 3.16 | 3.54 | 4.58 | 0.00 | 3.36 | 3.35 | 4.80 | 4.93 | 4.05 | 3.55 | 3.42 |
| 6 | 5.58 | 3.82 | 4.19 | 4.55 | 3.36 | 0.00 | 4.76 | 4.13 | 4.09 | 3.84 | 2.81 | 3.36 |
| 7 | 2.74 | 3.23 | 3.24 | 4.71 | 3.35 | 4.76 | 0.00 | 5.33 | 5.31 | 3.93 | 4.61 | 4.26 |
| 8 | 5.49 | 3.82 | 3.60 | 2.96 | 4.80 | 4.13 | 5.33 | 0.00 | 3.82 | 3.94 | 4.28 | 4.65 |
| 9 | 5.81 | 4.35 | 4.18 | 4.43 | 4.93 | 4.09 | 5.31 | 3.82 | 0.00 | 2.97 | 3.84 | 4.25 |
| 10 | 4.35 | 3.39 | 3.05 | 3.90 | 4.05 | 3.84 | 3.93 | 3.94 | 2.97 | 0.00 | 3.36 | 3.40 |
| 11 | 5.43 | 3.57 | 3.98 | 4.63 | 3.55 | 2.81 | 4.61 | 4.28 | 3.84 | 3.36 | 0.00 | 2.42 |
| 12 | 5.08 | 3.49 | 3.88 | 4.64 | 3.42 | 3.36 | 4.26 | 4.65 | 4.25 | 3.40 | 2.42 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| 2 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.66 |
| 3 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.64 |
| 4 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.54 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.59 |
| 5 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62 |
| 6 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.62 |
| 7 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.62 |
| 8 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.63 |
| 9 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.65 |
| 10 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.73 |
| 11 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.74 |
| 12 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013