| Project Name | IndividualG |
| Project Name | IndividualG |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| Cluster density | 196.4 | 142.7 | 140.4 | 138.4 | 134.3 | 117.7 | 108.4 | 107.5 | 107.1 | 72.9 | 68.9 |
| Cluster size | 290 | 228 | 185 | 228 | 236 | 173 | 124 | 136 | 134 | 137 | 129 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| RMSD | 5.60 | 4.57 | 5.44 | 4.38 | 5.90 | 6.08 | 5.79 | 5.01 | 6.55 | 5.03 | 5.64 |
| GDT_TS | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.51 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.28 | 7.09 | 4.18 | 6.25 | 3.13 | 4.09 | 3.39 | 4.84 | 4.01 | 4.43 |
| 2 | 3.28 | 0.00 | 5.51 | 5.55 | 4.75 | 2.72 | 2.93 | 1.76 | 2.97 | 1.33 | 2.05 |
| 3 | 7.09 | 5.51 | 0.00 | 6.56 | 4.37 | 6.88 | 5.03 | 4.91 | 6.47 | 5.35 | 5.72 |
| 4 | 4.18 | 5.55 | 6.56 | 0.00 | 7.21 | 5.30 | 6.72 | 5.72 | 6.32 | 6.45 | 5.78 |
| 5 | 6.25 | 4.75 | 4.37 | 7.21 | 0.00 | 6.27 | 4.10 | 4.40 | 6.10 | 4.73 | 5.30 |
| 6 | 3.13 | 2.72 | 6.88 | 5.30 | 6.27 | 0.00 | 4.40 | 3.37 | 2.76 | 3.20 | 2.94 |
| 7 | 4.09 | 2.93 | 5.03 | 6.72 | 4.10 | 4.40 | 0.00 | 2.04 | 4.37 | 2.63 | 3.64 |
| 8 | 3.39 | 1.76 | 4.91 | 5.72 | 4.40 | 3.37 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 3.56 | 1.79 | 2.54 |
| 9 | 4.84 | 2.97 | 6.47 | 6.32 | 6.10 | 2.76 | 4.37 | 3.56 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 1.63 |
| 10 | 4.01 | 1.33 | 5.35 | 6.45 | 4.73 | 3.20 | 2.63 | 1.79 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| 11 | 4.43 | 2.05 | 5.72 | 5.78 | 5.30 | 2.94 | 3.64 | 2.54 | 1.63 | 1.82 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.61 |
| 2 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.85 | 0.75 |
| 3 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.51 | 0.49 |
| 4 | 0.64 | 0.51 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.47 |
| 5 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.52 |
| 6 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.74 |
| 7 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.54 | 0.71 | 0.57 |
| 8 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.79 | 0.71 |
| 9 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.69 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.84 |
| 10 | 0.63 | 0.85 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| 11 | 0.61 | 0.75 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013