| Project Name | R54L |
| Project Name | R54L |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 108.1 | 107.9 | 75.4 | 75.0 | 71.9 | 61.4 | 58.2 | 54.9 | 53.9 | 52.5 | 41.4 | 31.4 |
| Cluster size | 242 | 277 | 176 | 194 | 204 | 143 | 131 | 170 | 140 | 144 | 110 | 69 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.2 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.02 | 3.34 | 3.45 | 3.77 | 4.11 | 3.46 | 3.54 | 3.41 | 3.46 | 5.07 | 4.18 | 6.24 |
| GDT_TS | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.76 | 0.52 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.35 | 3.10 | 4.24 | 4.27 | 1.68 | 2.02 | 2.92 | 2.68 | 5.22 | 3.76 | 6.23 |
| 2 | 3.35 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 2.42 | 3.46 | 4.37 | 3.96 | 4.08 | 3.60 | 3.45 | 4.44 | 4.79 |
| 3 | 3.10 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 1.86 | 3.15 | 4.15 | 3.41 | 4.22 | 3.66 | 3.62 | 4.61 | 4.92 |
| 4 | 4.24 | 2.42 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 2.71 | 5.20 | 4.45 | 4.88 | 4.55 | 3.16 | 5.16 | 4.43 |
| 5 | 4.27 | 3.46 | 3.15 | 2.71 | 0.00 | 4.94 | 4.81 | 4.89 | 4.37 | 4.39 | 5.36 | 4.79 |
| 6 | 1.68 | 4.37 | 4.15 | 5.20 | 4.94 | 0.00 | 2.41 | 2.36 | 2.48 | 5.80 | 3.33 | 6.57 |
| 7 | 2.02 | 3.96 | 3.41 | 4.45 | 4.81 | 2.41 | 0.00 | 3.67 | 3.30 | 5.48 | 4.28 | 6.68 |
| 8 | 2.92 | 4.08 | 4.22 | 4.88 | 4.89 | 2.36 | 3.67 | 0.00 | 1.87 | 4.75 | 1.88 | 5.39 |
| 9 | 2.68 | 3.60 | 3.66 | 4.55 | 4.37 | 2.48 | 3.30 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 4.88 | 2.93 | 5.64 |
| 10 | 5.22 | 3.45 | 3.62 | 3.16 | 4.39 | 5.80 | 5.48 | 4.75 | 4.88 | 0.00 | 4.12 | 2.26 |
| 11 | 3.76 | 4.44 | 4.61 | 5.16 | 5.36 | 3.33 | 4.28 | 1.88 | 2.93 | 4.12 | 0.00 | 4.59 |
| 12 | 6.23 | 4.79 | 4.92 | 4.43 | 4.79 | 6.57 | 6.68 | 5.39 | 5.64 | 2.26 | 4.59 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.63 | 0.84 | 0.57 |
| 2 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 0.61 | 0.71 |
| 3 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.70 |
| 4 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.83 | 0.61 | 0.75 |
| 5 | 0.58 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.83 | 0.55 | 0.83 |
| 6 | 0.84 | 0.57 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.58 | 0.86 | 0.59 |
| 7 | 0.84 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.84 | 0.64 |
| 8 | 0.81 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.60 | 0.93 | 0.58 |
| 9 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.81 | 0.57 |
| 10 | 0.63 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.82 |
| 11 | 0.84 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.93 | 0.81 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| 12 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.82 | 0.60 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013