| Project Name | MUT_2 |
| Project Name | MUT_2 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 418.1 | 368.2 | 325.4 | 296.1 | 282.0 | 281.4 | 242.1 | 179.4 | 170.6 | 163.1 | 160.6 | 123.0 |
| Cluster size | 248 | 235 | 212 | 191 | 190 | 185 | 171 | 140 | 121 | 108 | 111 | 88 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.50 | 1.55 | 1.83 | 1.87 | 1.68 | 1.62 | 1.70 | 1.73 | 2.65 | 2.20 | 1.51 | 2.00 |
| GDT_TS | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.79 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.47 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.41 | 0.71 | 1.71 | 1.44 | 0.51 | 0.76 |
| 2 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.41 | 1.70 | 1.38 | 0.66 | 0.74 |
| 3 | 0.60 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.48 | 0.85 | 1.46 | 1.50 | 0.61 | 0.74 |
| 4 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.51 | 0.88 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 1.67 | 1.50 | 0.84 | 0.47 |
| 5 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.64 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 1.65 | 1.42 | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| 6 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.88 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.73 | 1.62 | 1.41 | 0.49 | 0.99 |
| 7 | 0.41 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 1.60 | 1.43 | 0.47 | 0.67 |
| 8 | 0.71 | 0.41 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 1.75 | 1.41 | 0.86 | 0.75 |
| 9 | 1.71 | 1.70 | 1.46 | 1.67 | 1.65 | 1.62 | 1.60 | 1.75 | 0.00 | 2.04 | 1.69 | 1.62 |
| 10 | 1.44 | 1.38 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.42 | 1.41 | 1.43 | 1.41 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 1.46 | 1.53 |
| 11 | 0.51 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.84 | 0.78 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.86 | 1.69 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| 12 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.47 | 0.69 | 0.99 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 1.62 | 1.53 | 0.91 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.97 |
| 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.99 | 0.97 |
| 3 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.97 |
| 4 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 1.00 |
| 5 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.98 |
| 6 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.93 |
| 7 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.98 |
| 8 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
| 9 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.94 |
| 10 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.93 |
| 11 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.96 |
| 12 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013