| Project Name | iso2 |
| Project Name | iso2 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 194.4 | 174.0 | 139.3 | 132.7 | 112.6 | 110.0 | 109.0 | 108.4 | 90.3 | 75.2 | 63.6 | 63.3 |
| Cluster size | 304 | 257 | 196 | 196 | 155 | 169 | 158 | 160 | 113 | 122 | 87 | 83 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.49 | 4.68 | 4.76 | 4.83 | 4.49 | 5.13 | 4.76 | 4.52 | 4.74 | 5.47 | 4.65 | 4.46 |
| GDT_TS | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.12 | 3.91 | 3.78 | 4.45 | 4.36 | 4.50 | 2.80 | 3.42 | 5.83 | 3.70 | 4.09 |
| 2 | 3.12 | 0.00 | 3.88 | 4.24 | 4.84 | 4.49 | 4.75 | 3.50 | 3.91 | 6.19 | 3.82 | 4.48 |
| 3 | 3.91 | 3.88 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 3.51 | 2.99 | 3.12 | 2.89 | 2.50 | 4.79 | 3.22 | 3.38 |
| 4 | 3.78 | 4.24 | 2.62 | 0.00 | 3.57 | 3.64 | 3.46 | 2.76 | 2.66 | 5.10 | 2.99 | 3.90 |
| 5 | 4.45 | 4.84 | 3.51 | 3.57 | 0.00 | 3.19 | 2.41 | 3.61 | 3.64 | 3.44 | 4.14 | 2.85 |
| 6 | 4.36 | 4.49 | 2.99 | 3.64 | 3.19 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 3.44 | 3.62 | 4.81 | 4.30 | 3.02 |
| 7 | 4.50 | 4.75 | 3.12 | 3.46 | 2.41 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 3.57 | 3.46 | 4.10 | 3.99 | 2.70 |
| 8 | 2.80 | 3.50 | 2.89 | 2.76 | 3.61 | 3.44 | 3.57 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 4.96 | 3.02 | 3.36 |
| 9 | 3.42 | 3.91 | 2.50 | 2.66 | 3.64 | 3.62 | 3.46 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 4.64 | 2.86 | 3.72 |
| 10 | 5.83 | 6.19 | 4.79 | 5.10 | 3.44 | 4.81 | 4.10 | 4.96 | 4.64 | 0.00 | 5.38 | 4.64 |
| 11 | 3.70 | 3.82 | 3.22 | 2.99 | 4.14 | 4.30 | 3.99 | 3.02 | 2.86 | 5.38 | 0.00 | 4.47 |
| 12 | 4.09 | 4.48 | 3.38 | 3.90 | 2.85 | 3.02 | 2.70 | 3.36 | 3.72 | 4.64 | 4.47 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.47 | 0.62 | 0.54 |
| 2 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.42 | 0.57 | 0.51 |
| 3 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.49 | 0.63 | 0.58 |
| 4 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.45 | 0.72 | 0.54 |
| 5 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.68 |
| 6 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.64 |
| 7 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.69 |
| 8 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.53 | 0.68 | 0.58 |
| 9 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.70 | 0.54 |
| 10 | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.47 | 0.53 |
| 11 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.47 | 1.00 | 0.53 |
| 12 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013