| Project Name | Miller_Tetherin |
| Project Name | Miller_Tetherin |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| Cluster density | 186.1 | 146.5 | 109.8 | 88.2 | 87.1 | 78.1 | 72.2 | 65.9 | 62.7 | 40.2 | 32.7 |
| Cluster size | 379 | 395 | 295 | 172 | 137 | 121 | 141 | 133 | 96 | 67 | 64 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.0 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| RMSD | 15.10 | 11.30 | 10.50 | 8.49 | 8.82 | 9.70 | 8.09 | 14.30 | 13.00 | 7.18 | 6.31 |
| GDT_TS | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.45 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 6.41 | 6.35 | 8.30 | 8.57 | 7.61 | 8.97 | 4.23 | 4.47 | 10.30 | 11.00 |
| 2 | 6.41 | 0.00 | 4.30 | 4.59 | 4.00 | 4.02 | 5.29 | 5.70 | 4.79 | 6.80 | 7.99 |
| 3 | 6.35 | 4.30 | 0.00 | 4.87 | 5.31 | 4.72 | 5.61 | 5.70 | 4.58 | 6.58 | 7.34 |
| 4 | 8.30 | 4.59 | 4.87 | 0.00 | 3.10 | 2.59 | 2.65 | 7.23 | 6.10 | 3.77 | 4.89 |
| 5 | 8.57 | 4.00 | 5.31 | 3.10 | 0.00 | 3.06 | 2.88 | 7.74 | 6.43 | 4.63 | 6.06 |
| 6 | 7.61 | 4.02 | 4.72 | 2.59 | 3.06 | 0.00 | 3.33 | 6.39 | 5.05 | 4.33 | 5.86 |
| 7 | 8.97 | 5.29 | 5.61 | 2.65 | 2.88 | 3.33 | 0.00 | 8.23 | 7.06 | 3.47 | 4.64 |
| 8 | 4.23 | 5.70 | 5.70 | 7.23 | 7.74 | 6.39 | 8.23 | 0.00 | 3.13 | 9.31 | 10.20 |
| 9 | 4.47 | 4.79 | 4.58 | 6.10 | 6.43 | 5.05 | 7.06 | 3.13 | 0.00 | 8.05 | 9.08 |
| 10 | 10.30 | 6.80 | 6.58 | 3.77 | 4.63 | 4.33 | 3.47 | 9.31 | 8.05 | 0.00 | 3.31 |
| 11 | 11.00 | 7.99 | 7.34 | 4.89 | 6.06 | 5.86 | 4.64 | 10.20 | 9.08 | 3.31 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.41 | 0.40 |
| 2 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.45 |
| 3 | 0.46 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.40 |
| 4 | 0.44 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.64 | 0.60 |
| 5 | 0.45 | 0.64 | 0.48 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.52 |
| 6 | 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.51 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.56 |
| 7 | 0.44 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.70 | 0.60 |
| 8 | 0.61 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.38 | 0.37 |
| 9 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.43 | 0.39 |
| 10 | 0.41 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 1.00 | 0.69 |
| 11 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.37 | 0.39 | 0.69 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013