| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 278.7 | 219.1 | 140.1 | 92.4 | 87.0 | 79.2 | 69.2 | 54.0 | 46.1 | 45.8 | 36.9 | 36.1 |
| Cluster size | 414 | 355 | 229 | 168 | 148 | 173 | 116 | 92 | 81 | 95 | 56 | 73 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 7.36 | 6.18 | 6.02 | 4.94 | 6.30 | 5.74 | 6.04 | 5.11 | 5.18 | 5.33 | 5.05 | 5.05 |
| GDT_TS | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.55 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.38 | 3.78 | 5.12 | 3.76 | 3.10 | 3.62 | 6.70 | 7.84 | 7.50 | 6.28 | 8.38 |
| 2 | 3.38 | 0.00 | 3.34 | 4.66 | 3.01 | 2.75 | 2.72 | 6.35 | 7.12 | 6.76 | 5.70 | 7.39 |
| 3 | 3.78 | 3.34 | 0.00 | 3.58 | 3.08 | 3.54 | 3.69 | 5.59 | 6.47 | 6.17 | 4.74 | 7.05 |
| 4 | 5.12 | 4.66 | 3.58 | 0.00 | 4.07 | 3.64 | 4.03 | 3.71 | 4.78 | 4.33 | 3.38 | 5.72 |
| 5 | 3.76 | 3.01 | 3.08 | 4.07 | 0.00 | 2.92 | 2.99 | 5.98 | 6.72 | 6.46 | 4.99 | 7.11 |
| 6 | 3.10 | 2.75 | 3.54 | 3.64 | 2.92 | 0.00 | 2.54 | 5.56 | 6.57 | 6.19 | 4.77 | 7.28 |
| 7 | 3.62 | 2.72 | 3.69 | 4.03 | 2.99 | 2.54 | 0.00 | 5.65 | 6.70 | 6.20 | 5.17 | 7.31 |
| 8 | 6.70 | 6.35 | 5.59 | 3.71 | 5.98 | 5.56 | 5.65 | 0.00 | 3.27 | 2.79 | 3.53 | 4.33 |
| 9 | 7.84 | 7.12 | 6.47 | 4.78 | 6.72 | 6.57 | 6.70 | 3.27 | 0.00 | 2.88 | 3.89 | 2.94 |
| 10 | 7.50 | 6.76 | 6.17 | 4.33 | 6.46 | 6.19 | 6.20 | 2.79 | 2.88 | 0.00 | 4.15 | 3.68 |
| 11 | 6.28 | 5.70 | 4.74 | 3.38 | 4.99 | 4.77 | 5.17 | 3.53 | 3.89 | 4.15 | 0.00 | 5.12 |
| 12 | 8.38 | 7.39 | 7.05 | 5.72 | 7.11 | 7.28 | 7.31 | 4.33 | 2.94 | 3.68 | 5.12 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.47 |
| 2 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.50 |
| 3 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.51 |
| 4 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.53 |
| 5 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.55 | 0.48 |
| 6 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.45 |
| 7 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.52 |
| 8 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.53 |
| 9 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.59 | 0.67 |
| 10 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| 11 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.54 |
| 12 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013