| Project Name | 28(I-T)minimized |
| Project Name | 28(I-T)minimized |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 472.4 | 414.4 | 397.4 | 389.5 | 374.7 | 320.9 | 140.7 | 73.3 | 50.5 | 48.7 | 31.7 | 23.0 |
| Cluster size | 313 | 264 | 279 | 274 | 257 | 259 | 114 | 60 | 37 | 39 | 66 | 38 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 1.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.50 | 1.51 | 1.53 | 1.29 | 1.26 | 1.46 | 2.32 | 5.20 | 3.66 | 2.12 | 4.20 | 2.20 |
| GDT_TS | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.86 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 1.48 | 4.22 | 2.69 | 1.64 | 3.40 | 2.32 |
| 2 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.51 | 1.40 | 4.24 | 2.70 | 1.70 | 3.36 | 2.36 |
| 3 | 0.65 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.56 | 0.73 | 1.65 | 4.09 | 2.78 | 1.55 | 3.53 | 2.15 |
| 4 | 0.64 | 0.50 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 1.56 | 4.51 | 2.90 | 1.70 | 3.50 | 2.30 |
| 5 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 1.65 | 4.40 | 2.94 | 1.56 | 3.63 | 2.10 |
| 6 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 4.33 | 2.86 | 1.57 | 3.41 | 2.15 |
| 7 | 1.48 | 1.40 | 1.65 | 1.56 | 1.65 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 3.77 | 2.64 | 2.22 | 2.69 | 2.90 |
| 8 | 4.22 | 4.24 | 4.09 | 4.51 | 4.40 | 4.33 | 3.77 | 0.00 | 2.68 | 4.56 | 2.06 | 4.86 |
| 9 | 2.69 | 2.70 | 2.78 | 2.90 | 2.94 | 2.86 | 2.64 | 2.68 | 0.00 | 3.39 | 2.46 | 4.15 |
| 10 | 1.64 | 1.70 | 1.55 | 1.70 | 1.56 | 1.57 | 2.22 | 4.56 | 3.39 | 0.00 | 3.90 | 2.52 |
| 11 | 3.40 | 3.36 | 3.53 | 3.50 | 3.63 | 3.41 | 2.69 | 2.06 | 2.46 | 3.90 | 0.00 | 4.06 |
| 12 | 2.32 | 2.36 | 2.15 | 2.30 | 2.10 | 2.15 | 2.90 | 4.86 | 4.15 | 2.52 | 4.06 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.97 | 0.87 | 0.89 |
| 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.97 | 0.86 | 0.89 |
| 3 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.91 |
| 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 0.90 |
| 5 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.97 | 0.86 | 0.92 |
| 6 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.97 | 0.86 | 0.90 |
| 7 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.88 |
| 8 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 0.80 |
| 9 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.86 | 0.74 |
| 10 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.89 |
| 11 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.83 |
| 12 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013