Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 211.7 | 179.9 | 131.5 | 130.8 | 124.9 | 121.7 | 120.5 | 108.0 | 106.8 | 104.7 | 80.0 | 78.2 |
Cluster size | 298 | 251 | 178 | 175 | 162 | 169 | 166 | 147 | 125 | 139 | 95 | 95 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.92 | 3.01 | 3.23 | 3.38 | 3.31 | 3.30 | 2.65 | 3.00 | 3.37 | 3.20 | 3.14 | 3.39 |
GDT_TS | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.64 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.63 | 2.30 | 3.21 | 3.01 | 2.81 | 2.49 | 2.37 | 2.33 | 2.71 | 2.56 | 2.39 |
2 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 2.06 | 1.91 | 2.19 | 3.06 | 2.44 | 2.41 | 2.42 | 2.08 | 2.61 |
3 | 2.30 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 3.07 | 2.88 | 2.47 | 2.83 | 2.10 | 2.37 | 2.83 | 2.63 | 2.15 |
4 | 3.21 | 2.06 | 3.07 | 0.00 | 1.88 | 2.30 | 3.50 | 2.79 | 2.83 | 2.54 | 2.37 | 2.80 |
5 | 3.01 | 1.91 | 2.88 | 1.88 | 0.00 | 2.38 | 3.35 | 2.67 | 2.52 | 2.63 | 2.31 | 2.80 |
6 | 2.81 | 2.19 | 2.47 | 2.30 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 3.18 | 2.27 | 2.41 | 2.32 | 2.28 | 2.18 |
7 | 2.49 | 3.06 | 2.83 | 3.50 | 3.35 | 3.18 | 0.00 | 2.48 | 2.84 | 3.13 | 2.87 | 2.96 |
8 | 2.37 | 2.44 | 2.10 | 2.79 | 2.67 | 2.27 | 2.48 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 2.46 | 2.32 | 2.04 |
9 | 2.33 | 2.41 | 2.37 | 2.83 | 2.52 | 2.41 | 2.84 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 2.18 | 2.25 |
10 | 2.71 | 2.42 | 2.83 | 2.54 | 2.63 | 2.32 | 3.13 | 2.46 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 2.43 |
11 | 2.56 | 2.08 | 2.63 | 2.37 | 2.31 | 2.28 | 2.87 | 2.32 | 2.18 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 2.45 |
12 | 2.39 | 2.61 | 2.15 | 2.80 | 2.80 | 2.18 | 2.96 | 2.04 | 2.25 | 2.43 | 2.45 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
2 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.67 |
3 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.71 |
4 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.65 |
5 | 0.63 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.63 |
6 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
7 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.65 |
8 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.75 |
9 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.71 |
10 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
11 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
12 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013