| Project Name | group3mutation2HET |
| Project Name | group3mutation2HET |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 426.8 | 405.5 | 399.0 | 200.8 | 173.3 | 90.1 | 85.4 | 84.9 | 73.2 | 63.4 | 47.7 | 34.4 |
| Cluster size | 348 | 331 | 341 | 211 | 207 | 92 | 96 | 121 | 82 | 67 | 55 | 49 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.51 | 2.01 | 1.80 | 1.69 | 1.84 | 2.83 | 1.59 | 2.48 | 2.56 | 2.41 | 1.46 | 3.77 |
| GDT_TS | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.77 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.79 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 2.31 | 0.57 | 1.61 | 2.07 | 1.64 | 1.00 | 3.21 |
| 2 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 2.44 | 0.98 | 1.54 | 2.36 | 1.73 | 1.45 | 3.30 |
| 3 | 0.58 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 2.37 | 0.46 | 1.70 | 2.21 | 1.51 | 1.39 | 3.16 |
| 4 | 0.52 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.67 | 2.37 | 0.80 | 1.58 | 2.09 | 1.58 | 1.04 | 3.23 |
| 5 | 0.55 | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 0.70 | 1.55 | 1.94 | 1.57 | 1.19 | 2.99 |
| 6 | 2.31 | 2.44 | 2.37 | 2.37 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 1.96 | 1.11 | 2.72 | 2.49 | 1.56 |
| 7 | 0.57 | 0.98 | 0.46 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 1.77 | 2.17 | 1.62 | 1.29 | 3.15 |
| 8 | 1.61 | 1.54 | 1.70 | 1.58 | 1.55 | 1.96 | 1.77 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 2.27 | 1.82 | 2.64 |
| 9 | 2.07 | 2.36 | 2.21 | 2.09 | 1.94 | 1.11 | 2.17 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 2.10 | 1.92 |
| 10 | 1.64 | 1.73 | 1.51 | 1.58 | 1.57 | 2.72 | 1.62 | 2.27 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 3.38 |
| 11 | 1.00 | 1.45 | 1.39 | 1.04 | 1.19 | 2.49 | 1.29 | 1.82 | 2.10 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 3.56 |
| 12 | 3.21 | 3.30 | 3.16 | 3.23 | 2.99 | 1.56 | 3.15 | 2.64 | 1.92 | 3.38 | 3.56 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.91 |
| 2 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.87 |
| 3 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.89 |
| 4 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.91 |
| 5 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.90 |
| 6 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.91 |
| 7 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.91 |
| 8 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.91 |
| 9 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.94 |
| 10 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.88 |
| 11 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.88 |
| 12 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013