Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 202.9 | 181.4 | 172.6 | 167.2 | 146.0 | 142.0 | 138.0 | 117.6 | 110.0 | 106.6 | 84.1 | 62.8 |
Cluster size | 244 | 238 | 203 | 211 | 200 | 172 | 179 | 143 | 125 | 121 | 92 | 72 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.74 | 3.70 | 3.73 | 3.57 | 3.62 | 3.70 | 3.06 | 3.47 | 3.65 | 3.81 | 3.40 | 3.20 |
GDT_TS | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.62 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.54 | 2.37 | 2.60 | 2.54 | 2.84 | 2.75 | 2.27 | 2.91 | 3.04 | 2.61 | 3.10 |
2 | 2.54 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 2.33 | 2.21 | 2.63 | 2.55 | 2.32 | 2.87 | 2.76 | 1.84 | 3.06 |
3 | 2.37 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 2.26 | 2.47 | 2.97 | 1.97 | 2.90 | 2.89 | 2.38 | 3.48 |
4 | 2.60 | 2.33 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 2.45 | 2.54 | 3.16 | 2.39 | 3.03 | 2.90 | 2.09 | 3.37 |
5 | 2.54 | 2.21 | 2.26 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 2.60 | 2.62 | 2.37 | 2.60 | 2.63 | 2.13 | 3.04 |
6 | 2.84 | 2.63 | 2.47 | 2.54 | 2.60 | 0.00 | 3.21 | 2.40 | 2.87 | 2.81 | 2.52 | 3.45 |
7 | 2.75 | 2.55 | 2.97 | 3.16 | 2.62 | 3.21 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 2.72 | 3.11 | 2.69 | 2.30 |
8 | 2.27 | 2.32 | 1.97 | 2.39 | 2.37 | 2.40 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 2.64 | 2.79 | 2.35 | 3.14 |
9 | 2.91 | 2.87 | 2.90 | 3.03 | 2.60 | 2.87 | 2.72 | 2.64 | 0.00 | 1.78 | 2.71 | 3.16 |
10 | 3.04 | 2.76 | 2.89 | 2.90 | 2.63 | 2.81 | 3.11 | 2.79 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 2.65 | 3.35 |
11 | 2.61 | 1.84 | 2.38 | 2.09 | 2.13 | 2.52 | 2.69 | 2.35 | 2.71 | 2.65 | 0.00 | 3.00 |
12 | 3.10 | 3.06 | 3.48 | 3.37 | 3.04 | 3.45 | 2.30 | 3.14 | 3.16 | 3.35 | 3.00 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.59 |
2 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.61 |
3 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.57 |
4 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.62 |
5 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.63 |
6 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.59 |
7 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.70 |
8 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.59 |
9 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.64 |
10 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.63 |
11 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.62 |
12 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013