| Project Name | 3zx8 |
| Project Name | 3zx8 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 225.3 | 206.2 | 196.3 | 173.6 | 167.4 | 134.0 | 130.9 | 130.2 | 111.3 | 103.9 | 98.1 | 82.8 |
| Cluster size | 268 | 232 | 228 | 207 | 193 | 153 | 150 | 147 | 114 | 107 | 120 | 81 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.98 | 2.90 | 3.02 | 3.10 | 3.12 | 2.96 | 2.85 | 3.15 | 3.26 | 3.53 | 3.15 | 3.04 |
| GDT_TS | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.60 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.88 | 1.90 | 1.95 | 2.51 | 1.91 | 1.85 | 1.89 | 2.22 | 2.05 | 2.11 | 2.03 |
| 2 | 1.88 | 0.00 | 2.02 | 2.23 | 2.01 | 1.86 | 2.05 | 2.05 | 1.93 | 1.95 | 1.78 | 2.05 |
| 3 | 1.90 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 2.09 | 2.19 | 1.63 | 1.84 | 2.15 | 2.05 | 2.08 | 2.00 | 2.09 |
| 4 | 1.95 | 2.23 | 2.09 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 2.06 | 1.66 | 2.00 | 2.08 | 2.35 | 2.12 | 2.01 |
| 5 | 2.51 | 2.01 | 2.19 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 2.20 | 2.19 | 1.91 | 2.52 | 1.74 | 2.03 |
| 6 | 1.91 | 1.86 | 1.63 | 2.06 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 1.86 | 2.03 | 1.93 | 2.10 | 1.89 | 2.20 |
| 7 | 1.85 | 2.05 | 1.84 | 1.66 | 2.20 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.25 | 2.08 | 2.10 |
| 8 | 1.89 | 2.05 | 2.15 | 2.00 | 2.19 | 2.03 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 2.29 | 1.96 | 2.21 |
| 9 | 2.22 | 1.93 | 2.05 | 2.08 | 1.91 | 1.93 | 2.07 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 1.80 | 2.12 |
| 10 | 2.05 | 1.95 | 2.08 | 2.35 | 2.52 | 2.10 | 2.25 | 2.29 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 2.35 |
| 11 | 2.11 | 1.78 | 2.00 | 2.12 | 1.74 | 1.89 | 2.08 | 1.96 | 1.80 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 1.95 |
| 12 | 2.03 | 2.05 | 2.09 | 2.01 | 2.03 | 2.20 | 2.10 | 2.21 | 2.12 | 2.35 | 1.95 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.73 |
| 2 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| 3 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.72 |
| 4 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.73 |
| 5 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| 6 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.70 |
| 7 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.71 |
| 8 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.72 |
| 9 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.71 |
| 10 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.70 |
| 11 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.76 |
| 12 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013