| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 215.9 | 134.6 | 95.9 | 88.6 | 88.3 | 83.6 | 76.1 | 74.7 | 60.0 | 57.1 | 45.8 | 44.3 |
| Cluster size | 396 | 242 | 174 | 191 | 189 | 126 | 143 | 153 | 109 | 120 | 84 | 73 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.95 | 5.48 | 4.58 | 4.76 | 5.64 | 5.33 | 4.46 | 5.00 | 5.17 | 4.67 | 5.01 | 4.70 |
| GDT_TS | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.52 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.85 | 2.77 | 3.55 | 5.23 | 3.23 | 4.54 | 4.93 | 5.28 | 4.20 | 4.72 | 4.57 |
| 2 | 2.85 | 0.00 | 3.18 | 3.01 | 5.53 | 2.91 | 4.95 | 5.42 | 5.88 | 4.63 | 5.04 | 4.84 |
| 3 | 2.77 | 3.18 | 0.00 | 3.37 | 4.78 | 2.41 | 3.94 | 4.72 | 4.92 | 3.44 | 4.90 | 4.26 |
| 4 | 3.55 | 3.01 | 3.37 | 0.00 | 5.15 | 3.11 | 4.38 | 4.51 | 5.14 | 3.92 | 4.63 | 3.70 |
| 5 | 5.23 | 5.53 | 4.78 | 5.15 | 0.00 | 5.62 | 3.02 | 3.02 | 2.78 | 3.41 | 5.94 | 4.79 |
| 6 | 3.23 | 2.91 | 2.41 | 3.11 | 5.62 | 0.00 | 4.72 | 5.42 | 5.77 | 4.25 | 4.87 | 4.47 |
| 7 | 4.54 | 4.95 | 3.94 | 4.38 | 3.02 | 4.72 | 0.00 | 3.08 | 2.81 | 3.03 | 5.43 | 4.18 |
| 8 | 4.93 | 5.42 | 4.72 | 4.51 | 3.02 | 5.42 | 3.08 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 3.07 | 5.05 | 3.47 |
| 9 | 5.28 | 5.88 | 4.92 | 5.14 | 2.78 | 5.77 | 2.81 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 3.24 | 5.88 | 4.42 |
| 10 | 4.20 | 4.63 | 3.44 | 3.92 | 3.41 | 4.25 | 3.03 | 3.07 | 3.24 | 0.00 | 5.31 | 3.50 |
| 11 | 4.72 | 5.04 | 4.90 | 4.63 | 5.94 | 4.87 | 5.43 | 5.05 | 5.88 | 5.31 | 0.00 | 3.83 |
| 12 | 4.57 | 4.84 | 4.26 | 3.70 | 4.79 | 4.47 | 4.18 | 3.47 | 4.42 | 3.50 | 3.83 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.47 | 0.52 |
| 2 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.51 |
| 3 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.47 | 0.54 |
| 4 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.49 | 0.59 |
| 5 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.47 | 0.54 |
| 6 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.47 | 0.52 |
| 7 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.45 | 0.55 |
| 8 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.50 | 0.65 |
| 9 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 0.57 |
| 10 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.64 |
| 11 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.57 |
| 12 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013