| Project Name | TetherinM61T |
| Project Name | TetherinM61T |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 239.8 | 187.5 | 180.8 | 180.3 | 174.9 | 157.7 | 129.2 | 128.3 | 126.0 | 64.7 | 54.0 | 33.4 |
| Cluster size | 255 | 217 | 269 | 229 | 255 | 208 | 130 | 122 | 158 | 46 | 64 | 47 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.80 | 4.20 | 2.63 | 3.16 | 2.98 | 3.21 | 2.19 | 3.16 | 3.28 | 5.07 | 3.00 | 2.32 |
| GDT_TS | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.72 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.25 | 2.57 | 1.30 | 3.26 | 3.04 | 3.09 | 3.48 | 1.98 | 3.78 | 1.31 | 1.92 |
| 2 | 3.25 | 0.00 | 3.54 | 3.20 | 4.06 | 2.41 | 2.66 | 2.85 | 3.10 | 1.28 | 2.86 | 2.78 |
| 3 | 2.57 | 3.54 | 0.00 | 1.76 | 1.33 | 2.65 | 2.39 | 2.53 | 1.99 | 4.28 | 2.14 | 1.63 |
| 4 | 1.30 | 3.20 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 2.44 | 2.60 | 2.62 | 2.86 | 1.82 | 3.98 | 1.17 | 1.28 |
| 5 | 3.26 | 4.06 | 1.33 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 3.39 | 3.02 | 3.18 | 2.46 | 4.79 | 2.76 | 2.21 |
| 6 | 3.04 | 2.41 | 2.65 | 2.60 | 3.39 | 0.00 | 1.76 | 1.38 | 3.24 | 3.43 | 2.49 | 2.17 |
| 7 | 3.09 | 2.66 | 2.39 | 2.62 | 3.02 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 1.92 | 2.71 | 3.61 | 2.27 | 1.72 |
| 8 | 3.48 | 2.85 | 2.53 | 2.86 | 3.18 | 1.38 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 3.26 | 3.81 | 2.78 | 2.38 |
| 9 | 1.98 | 3.10 | 1.99 | 1.82 | 2.46 | 3.24 | 2.71 | 3.26 | 0.00 | 3.59 | 1.87 | 1.70 |
| 10 | 3.78 | 1.28 | 4.28 | 3.98 | 4.79 | 3.43 | 3.61 | 3.81 | 3.59 | 0.00 | 3.58 | 3.64 |
| 11 | 1.31 | 2.86 | 2.14 | 1.17 | 2.76 | 2.49 | 2.27 | 2.78 | 1.87 | 3.58 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| 12 | 1.92 | 2.78 | 1.63 | 1.28 | 2.21 | 2.17 | 1.72 | 2.38 | 1.70 | 3.64 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.88 | 0.82 |
| 2 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.90 | 0.73 | 0.76 |
| 3 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.83 |
| 4 | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.88 | 0.88 |
| 5 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.91 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.78 |
| 6 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.75 | 0.76 |
| 7 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.80 |
| 8 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.72 |
| 9 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.78 |
| 10 | 0.70 | 0.90 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.71 |
| 11 | 0.88 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.88 |
| 12 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.88 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013