| Project Name | JH_022518_HeV_Nt_MoRE_only |
| Project Name | JH_022518_HeV_Nt_MoRE_only |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 356.1 | 333.0 | 295.4 | 283.3 | 276.8 | 268.5 | 254.5 | 195.0 | 107.4 | 56.4 | 55.6 | 48.1 |
| Cluster size | 259 | 263 | 241 | 214 | 214 | 197 | 200 | 151 | 97 | 51 | 64 | 49 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.55 | 0.79 | 4.70 | 4.05 | 4.22 | 4.96 | 3.86 | 3.75 | 3.25 | 3.13 | 1.77 | 3.68 |
| GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.96 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.93 | 0.72 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 4.21 | 0.53 | 0.99 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 1.11 | 1.33 | 2.27 | 3.47 | 3.71 | 2.34 |
| 2 | 4.21 | 0.00 | 4.34 | 3.78 | 3.93 | 4.58 | 3.60 | 3.51 | 3.05 | 2.86 | 1.54 | 3.43 |
| 3 | 0.53 | 4.34 | 0.00 | 1.18 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 1.32 | 1.52 | 2.37 | 3.48 | 3.86 | 2.36 |
| 4 | 0.99 | 3.78 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 1.53 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 1.56 | 3.23 | 3.35 | 1.90 |
| 5 | 0.68 | 3.93 | 0.81 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.14 | 0.71 | 0.91 | 1.81 | 3.27 | 3.49 | 2.05 |
| 6 | 0.71 | 4.58 | 0.66 | 1.53 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 1.62 | 1.86 | 2.74 | 3.81 | 4.11 | 2.63 |
| 7 | 1.11 | 3.60 | 1.32 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 1.33 | 2.92 | 3.09 | 1.69 |
| 8 | 1.33 | 3.51 | 1.52 | 0.53 | 0.91 | 1.86 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.26 | 3.01 | 3.11 | 1.82 |
| 9 | 2.27 | 3.05 | 2.37 | 1.56 | 1.81 | 2.74 | 1.33 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 2.69 | 1.58 |
| 10 | 3.47 | 2.86 | 3.48 | 3.23 | 3.27 | 3.81 | 2.92 | 3.01 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 2.49 | 2.59 |
| 11 | 3.71 | 1.54 | 3.86 | 3.35 | 3.49 | 4.11 | 3.09 | 3.11 | 2.69 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 3.19 |
| 12 | 2.34 | 3.43 | 2.36 | 1.90 | 2.05 | 2.63 | 1.69 | 1.82 | 1.58 | 2.59 | 3.19 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.84 |
| 2 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.94 | 0.75 |
| 3 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.82 |
| 4 | 0.94 | 0.72 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.88 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.88 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.89 |
| 5 | 0.97 | 0.72 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.84 |
| 6 | 0.96 | 0.69 | 0.97 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.81 |
| 7 | 0.93 | 0.72 | 0.91 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.88 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.93 |
| 8 | 0.89 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.84 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.90 |
| 9 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.94 |
| 10 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.76 |
| 11 | 0.71 | 0.94 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 12 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013