| Project Name | C10F |
| Project Name | C10F |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 168.6 | 167.1 | 151.5 | 126.9 | 94.8 | 85.1 | 80.3 | 66.9 | 58.4 | 51.1 | 45.3 | 34.6 |
| Cluster size | 285 | 265 | 280 | 224 | 171 | 157 | 135 | 137 | 104 | 96 | 80 | 66 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.10 | 4.51 | 4.00 | 4.59 | 4.05 | 4.48 | 4.40 | 3.66 | 4.10 | 4.19 | 3.87 | 4.18 |
| GDT_TS | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.60 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 2.42 | 3.15 | 2.68 | 2.62 | 2.98 | 2.92 | 2.60 | 2.55 | 3.31 | 4.49 |
| 2 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 2.84 | 3.01 | 2.98 | 2.41 | 3.34 | 3.41 | 2.67 | 4.02 | 4.45 |
| 3 | 2.42 | 2.67 | 0.00 | 2.89 | 2.21 | 2.80 | 2.40 | 3.04 | 2.91 | 2.48 | 3.50 | 4.18 |
| 4 | 3.15 | 2.84 | 2.89 | 0.00 | 2.98 | 3.10 | 3.08 | 3.45 | 3.63 | 2.84 | 3.60 | 4.76 |
| 5 | 2.68 | 3.01 | 2.21 | 2.98 | 0.00 | 2.85 | 2.91 | 3.46 | 3.03 | 2.79 | 3.32 | 4.79 |
| 6 | 2.62 | 2.98 | 2.80 | 3.10 | 2.85 | 0.00 | 3.19 | 3.41 | 3.00 | 2.42 | 3.15 | 4.41 |
| 7 | 2.98 | 2.41 | 2.40 | 3.08 | 2.91 | 3.19 | 0.00 | 3.28 | 3.58 | 2.73 | 4.16 | 4.70 |
| 8 | 2.92 | 3.34 | 3.04 | 3.45 | 3.46 | 3.41 | 3.28 | 0.00 | 3.66 | 3.12 | 3.42 | 3.78 |
| 9 | 2.60 | 3.41 | 2.91 | 3.63 | 3.03 | 3.00 | 3.58 | 3.66 | 0.00 | 3.11 | 3.17 | 4.63 |
| 10 | 2.55 | 2.67 | 2.48 | 2.84 | 2.79 | 2.42 | 2.73 | 3.12 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 3.29 | 3.94 |
| 11 | 3.31 | 4.02 | 3.50 | 3.60 | 3.32 | 3.15 | 4.16 | 3.42 | 3.17 | 3.29 | 0.00 | 3.92 |
| 12 | 4.49 | 4.45 | 4.18 | 4.76 | 4.79 | 4.41 | 4.70 | 3.78 | 4.63 | 3.94 | 3.92 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.61 |
| 2 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.66 |
| 3 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.65 |
| 4 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.62 |
| 5 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.62 |
| 6 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.65 |
| 7 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.63 |
| 8 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.68 |
| 9 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.59 |
| 10 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| 11 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.65 |
| 12 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013