| Project Name | 129D-E |
| Project Name | 129D-E |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 183.7 | 156.3 | 83.0 | 71.9 | 68.3 | 60.3 | 56.0 | 54.2 | 50.2 | 42.5 | 34.4 | 30.3 |
| Cluster size | 402 | 338 | 149 | 117 | 190 | 132 | 139 | 144 | 131 | 111 | 87 | 60 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 6.66 | 6.51 | 7.51 | 5.50 | 6.92 | 8.04 | 7.69 | 6.22 | 8.15 | 7.57 | 5.51 | 6.86 |
| GDT_TS | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.67 | 3.57 | 2.18 | 1.29 | 4.01 | 3.35 | 2.91 | 3.51 | 4.35 | 2.39 | 3.44 |
| 2 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 4.24 | 2.09 | 1.77 | 3.63 | 2.86 | 3.70 | 4.20 | 4.89 | 2.71 | 4.15 |
| 3 | 3.57 | 4.24 | 0.00 | 4.07 | 3.39 | 4.91 | 4.31 | 2.98 | 1.58 | 2.98 | 4.04 | 2.27 |
| 4 | 2.18 | 2.09 | 4.07 | 0.00 | 2.17 | 4.39 | 3.79 | 3.17 | 4.30 | 4.58 | 1.83 | 3.77 |
| 5 | 1.29 | 1.77 | 3.39 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 3.62 | 2.86 | 2.89 | 3.23 | 3.98 | 2.82 | 3.62 |
| 6 | 4.01 | 3.63 | 4.91 | 4.39 | 3.62 | 0.00 | 1.43 | 5.06 | 4.47 | 4.34 | 5.32 | 5.42 |
| 7 | 3.35 | 2.86 | 4.31 | 3.79 | 2.86 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 4.52 | 3.95 | 4.08 | 4.73 | 4.83 |
| 8 | 2.91 | 3.70 | 2.98 | 3.17 | 2.89 | 5.06 | 4.52 | 0.00 | 3.36 | 3.30 | 2.76 | 2.94 |
| 9 | 3.51 | 4.20 | 1.58 | 4.30 | 3.23 | 4.47 | 3.95 | 3.36 | 0.00 | 3.11 | 4.39 | 3.11 |
| 10 | 4.35 | 4.89 | 2.98 | 4.58 | 3.98 | 4.34 | 4.08 | 3.30 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 4.89 | 3.60 |
| 11 | 2.39 | 2.71 | 4.04 | 1.83 | 2.82 | 5.32 | 4.73 | 2.76 | 4.39 | 4.89 | 0.00 | 3.59 |
| 12 | 3.44 | 4.15 | 2.27 | 3.77 | 3.62 | 5.42 | 4.83 | 2.94 | 3.11 | 3.60 | 3.59 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.58 | 0.83 | 0.94 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 0.67 |
| 2 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.75 | 0.60 |
| 3 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.68 | 0.92 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.76 |
| 4 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.87 | 0.62 |
| 5 | 0.94 | 0.82 | 0.59 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.64 |
| 6 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 0.48 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.68 | 0.55 |
| 7 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.53 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.58 |
| 8 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.92 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.76 |
| 10 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.82 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.78 |
| 11 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.66 |
| 12 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.66 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013