| Project Name | NND |
| Project Name | NND |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 271.2 | 249.4 | 240.4 | 238.6 | 227.9 | 201.2 | 177.7 | 160.4 | 140.2 | 114.9 | 111.0 | 106.7 |
| Cluster size | 245 | 223 | 218 | 206 | 198 | 184 | 147 | 152 | 125 | 96 | 97 | 109 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.80 | 1.84 | 1.72 | 1.78 | 1.60 | 1.83 | 1.81 | 1.84 | 2.02 | 1.70 | 1.64 | 1.66 |
| GDT_TS | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.82 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 1.16 | 1.07 | 0.96 | 1.17 | 1.06 | 1.02 | 1.34 | 1.56 | 1.11 | 0.96 |
| 2 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.16 | 0.93 | 1.02 | 1.18 | 0.99 | 1.07 | 1.26 | 1.41 | 1.00 | 1.11 |
| 3 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 1.17 | 1.10 | 1.24 | 1.19 | 1.08 | 1.48 | 1.50 | 1.07 | 0.95 |
| 4 | 1.07 | 0.93 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 1.01 | 0.93 | 1.11 | 1.43 | 1.51 | 1.17 | 1.19 |
| 5 | 0.96 | 1.02 | 1.10 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 1.01 | 1.46 | 1.55 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| 6 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 1.24 | 1.01 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 1.11 | 1.28 | 1.49 | 1.77 | 1.27 | 1.14 |
| 7 | 1.06 | 0.99 | 1.19 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 1.18 | 1.57 | 1.60 | 1.03 | 1.13 |
| 8 | 1.02 | 1.07 | 1.08 | 1.11 | 1.01 | 1.28 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.30 | 1.48 | 0.92 | 1.01 |
| 9 | 1.34 | 1.26 | 1.48 | 1.43 | 1.46 | 1.49 | 1.57 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 1.19 | 1.51 | 1.50 |
| 10 | 1.56 | 1.41 | 1.50 | 1.51 | 1.55 | 1.77 | 1.60 | 1.48 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.42 | 1.60 |
| 11 | 1.11 | 1.00 | 1.07 | 1.17 | 0.96 | 1.27 | 1.03 | 0.92 | 1.51 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| 12 | 0.96 | 1.11 | 0.95 | 1.19 | 0.96 | 1.14 | 1.13 | 1.01 | 1.50 | 1.60 | 1.05 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.93 |
| 2 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.94 | 0.92 |
| 3 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 0.94 |
| 4 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.88 |
| 5 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.93 |
| 6 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.89 |
| 7 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0.91 |
| 8 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.94 | 0.93 |
| 9 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.84 |
| 10 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.83 |
| 11 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.91 |
| 12 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013