| Project Name | mutation45 |
| Project Name | mutation45 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 505.3 | 353.4 | 310.8 | 310.4 | 231.5 | 197.7 | 179.3 | 128.5 | 109.3 | 99.3 | 59.7 | 50.1 |
| Cluster size | 384 | 291 | 238 | 222 | 203 | 160 | 133 | 105 | 95 | 72 | 50 | 47 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.78 | 5.31 | 4.56 | 4.84 | 4.71 | 4.45 | 5.94 | 4.42 | 4.71 | 6.53 | 3.76 | 6.06 |
| GDT_TS | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.69 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.83 | 0.69 | 0.44 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 2.20 | 1.63 | 2.28 | 2.82 | 2.67 | 2.64 |
| 2 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 1.21 | 0.87 | 1.02 | 1.29 | 1.98 | 1.93 | 2.42 | 2.43 | 3.11 | 2.32 |
| 3 | 0.69 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.79 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 2.52 | 1.48 | 2.36 | 3.17 | 2.40 | 2.94 |
| 4 | 0.44 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 2.13 | 1.74 | 2.31 | 2.74 | 2.75 | 2.66 |
| 5 | 0.63 | 1.02 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 2.38 | 1.44 | 2.33 | 2.98 | 2.56 | 2.76 |
| 6 | 0.63 | 1.29 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 2.52 | 1.45 | 2.34 | 3.18 | 2.42 | 2.95 |
| 7 | 2.20 | 1.98 | 2.52 | 2.13 | 2.38 | 2.52 | 0.00 | 3.10 | 2.30 | 1.05 | 3.74 | 1.62 |
| 8 | 1.63 | 1.93 | 1.48 | 1.74 | 1.44 | 1.45 | 3.10 | 0.00 | 2.09 | 3.62 | 1.68 | 2.96 |
| 9 | 2.28 | 2.42 | 2.36 | 2.31 | 2.33 | 2.34 | 2.30 | 2.09 | 0.00 | 2.76 | 1.91 | 1.84 |
| 10 | 2.82 | 2.43 | 3.17 | 2.74 | 2.98 | 3.18 | 1.05 | 3.62 | 2.76 | 0.00 | 4.33 | 1.55 |
| 11 | 2.67 | 3.11 | 2.40 | 2.75 | 2.56 | 2.42 | 3.74 | 1.68 | 1.91 | 4.33 | 0.00 | 3.51 |
| 12 | 2.64 | 2.32 | 2.94 | 2.66 | 2.76 | 2.95 | 1.62 | 2.96 | 1.84 | 1.55 | 3.51 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.80 |
| 2 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.84 |
| 3 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.77 |
| 4 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.78 |
| 5 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.80 |
| 6 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.80 |
| 7 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.79 | 0.86 |
| 8 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.89 | 0.80 |
| 9 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.86 |
| 10 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.93 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.91 |
| 11 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 12 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.91 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013