| Project Name | a |
| Project Name | a |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 137.8 | 131.8 | 121.5 | 120.9 | 116.4 | 112.9 | 110.4 | 105.7 | 88.1 | 78.6 | 77.4 | 63.1 |
| Cluster size | 226 | 210 | 188 | 173 | 173 | 183 | 173 | 158 | 138 | 137 | 123 | 118 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.32 | 2.91 | 2.66 | 2.99 | 2.99 | 2.45 | 2.68 | 2.98 | 2.76 | 2.82 | 2.75 | 2.83 |
| GDT_TS | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.65 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.42 | 2.24 | 2.27 | 2.58 | 1.66 | 1.97 | 2.27 | 2.17 | 2.43 | 1.86 | 2.05 |
| 2 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 2.56 | 2.79 | 2.62 | 2.06 | 2.54 | 1.96 | 1.92 | 2.34 | 2.31 |
| 3 | 2.24 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 1.78 | 1.87 | 2.33 | 1.87 | 2.09 | 2.05 | 2.23 | 2.34 | 2.44 |
| 4 | 2.27 | 2.56 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 1.76 | 2.62 | 2.23 | 1.75 | 2.34 | 2.60 | 2.17 | 2.54 |
| 5 | 2.58 | 2.79 | 1.87 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 2.66 | 2.33 | 2.00 | 2.54 | 2.53 | 2.50 | 2.95 |
| 6 | 1.66 | 2.62 | 2.33 | 2.62 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 2.58 | 2.19 | 2.51 | 1.83 | 2.06 |
| 7 | 1.97 | 2.06 | 1.87 | 2.23 | 2.33 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 1.76 | 1.80 | 1.91 | 1.77 |
| 8 | 2.27 | 2.54 | 2.09 | 1.75 | 2.00 | 2.58 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 2.40 | 2.12 | 2.55 |
| 9 | 2.17 | 1.96 | 2.05 | 2.34 | 2.54 | 2.19 | 1.76 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 2.04 | 2.17 |
| 10 | 2.43 | 1.92 | 2.23 | 2.60 | 2.53 | 2.51 | 1.80 | 2.40 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 2.15 |
| 11 | 1.86 | 2.34 | 2.34 | 2.17 | 2.50 | 1.83 | 1.91 | 2.12 | 2.04 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 2.00 |
| 12 | 2.05 | 2.31 | 2.44 | 2.54 | 2.95 | 2.06 | 1.77 | 2.55 | 2.17 | 2.15 | 2.00 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.77 |
| 2 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.72 |
| 3 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.71 |
| 4 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| 5 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.67 |
| 6 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.76 |
| 7 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.80 |
| 8 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.68 |
| 9 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| 10 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| 11 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 12 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013