| Project Name | santhiya |
| Project Name | santhiya |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 185.0 | 156.6 | 123.4 | 114.3 | 108.3 | 97.9 | 93.2 | 82.0 | 40.9 | 40.4 | 38.2 | 21.3 |
| Cluster size | 346 | 296 | 225 | 195 | 168 | 150 | 162 | 131 | 92 | 125 | 78 | 32 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 8.55 | 8.17 | 9.28 | 8.21 | 9.13 | 8.61 | 8.12 | 7.65 | 9.49 | 6.27 | 9.40 | 9.18 |
| GDT_TS | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.59 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.52 | 2.56 | 3.17 | 3.22 | 3.32 | 3.42 | 3.47 | 4.61 | 4.61 | 3.61 | 5.28 |
| 2 | 3.52 | 0.00 | 3.24 | 2.18 | 2.89 | 2.68 | 2.31 | 3.09 | 5.64 | 4.12 | 5.09 | 6.63 |
| 3 | 2.56 | 3.24 | 0.00 | 2.95 | 2.60 | 3.25 | 3.38 | 4.09 | 4.80 | 5.32 | 3.72 | 5.75 |
| 4 | 3.17 | 2.18 | 2.95 | 0.00 | 2.49 | 2.68 | 2.30 | 3.21 | 5.64 | 4.25 | 4.78 | 6.45 |
| 5 | 3.22 | 2.89 | 2.60 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 3.22 | 3.15 | 3.74 | 5.33 | 5.07 | 4.58 | 6.50 |
| 6 | 3.32 | 2.68 | 3.25 | 2.68 | 3.22 | 0.00 | 2.25 | 3.07 | 5.22 | 4.33 | 4.49 | 5.88 |
| 7 | 3.42 | 2.31 | 3.38 | 2.30 | 3.15 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 2.95 | 5.66 | 4.12 | 4.90 | 6.49 |
| 8 | 3.47 | 3.09 | 4.09 | 3.21 | 3.74 | 3.07 | 2.95 | 0.00 | 5.40 | 3.08 | 4.91 | 5.98 |
| 9 | 4.61 | 5.64 | 4.80 | 5.64 | 5.33 | 5.22 | 5.66 | 5.40 | 0.00 | 5.70 | 3.52 | 3.83 |
| 10 | 4.61 | 4.12 | 5.32 | 4.25 | 5.07 | 4.33 | 4.12 | 3.08 | 5.70 | 0.00 | 5.65 | 5.91 |
| 11 | 3.61 | 5.09 | 3.72 | 4.78 | 4.58 | 4.49 | 4.90 | 4.91 | 3.52 | 5.65 | 0.00 | 3.49 |
| 12 | 5.28 | 6.63 | 5.75 | 6.45 | 6.50 | 5.88 | 6.49 | 5.98 | 3.83 | 5.91 | 3.49 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.71 |
| 2 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.67 |
| 3 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.68 |
| 4 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.65 |
| 5 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.68 |
| 6 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
| 7 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.64 |
| 8 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.64 |
| 9 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| 10 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.62 |
| 11 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 12 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013