| Project Name | 14CTB14Ph |
| Project Name | 14CTB14Ph |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 118.1 | 108.1 | 102.5 | 94.0 | 90.9 | 88.0 | 85.6 | 74.0 | 70.0 | 66.6 | 44.4 | 30.8 |
| Cluster size | 237 | 234 | 199 | 202 | 197 | 185 | 177 | 144 | 146 | 143 | 83 | 53 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 1.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.56 | 3.76 | 3.93 | 3.91 | 3.61 | 3.69 | 3.40 | 4.41 | 4.06 | 3.29 | 4.29 | 3.87 |
| GDT_TS | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.63 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.84 | 3.48 | 2.77 | 2.50 | 2.38 | 2.35 | 3.36 | 2.60 | 2.52 | 3.11 | 2.70 |
| 2 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 3.27 | 2.45 | 2.62 | 1.77 | 2.71 | 2.92 | 2.54 | 2.68 | 2.97 | 2.73 |
| 3 | 3.48 | 3.27 | 0.00 | 2.42 | 3.40 | 2.96 | 3.68 | 3.16 | 2.93 | 3.36 | 3.00 | 3.64 |
| 4 | 2.77 | 2.45 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 3.03 | 2.13 | 3.29 | 2.89 | 2.47 | 2.86 | 2.66 | 3.35 |
| 5 | 2.50 | 2.62 | 3.40 | 3.03 | 0.00 | 2.73 | 2.38 | 3.19 | 2.86 | 2.13 | 3.07 | 2.79 |
| 6 | 2.38 | 1.77 | 2.96 | 2.13 | 2.73 | 0.00 | 2.85 | 3.10 | 2.33 | 2.70 | 2.71 | 2.89 |
| 7 | 2.35 | 2.71 | 3.68 | 3.29 | 2.38 | 2.85 | 0.00 | 3.54 | 3.00 | 2.65 | 3.34 | 3.17 |
| 8 | 3.36 | 2.92 | 3.16 | 2.89 | 3.19 | 3.10 | 3.54 | 0.00 | 3.12 | 3.43 | 3.18 | 3.23 |
| 9 | 2.60 | 2.54 | 2.93 | 2.47 | 2.86 | 2.33 | 3.00 | 3.12 | 0.00 | 2.92 | 2.58 | 2.98 |
| 10 | 2.52 | 2.68 | 3.36 | 2.86 | 2.13 | 2.70 | 2.65 | 3.43 | 2.92 | 0.00 | 3.24 | 2.77 |
| 11 | 3.11 | 2.97 | 3.00 | 2.66 | 3.07 | 2.71 | 3.34 | 3.18 | 2.58 | 3.24 | 0.00 | 2.87 |
| 12 | 2.70 | 2.73 | 3.64 | 3.35 | 2.79 | 2.89 | 3.17 | 3.23 | 2.98 | 2.77 | 2.87 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.75 |
| 2 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.71 |
| 3 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.70 |
| 4 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
| 5 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.72 |
| 6 | 0.77 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
| 7 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.72 |
| 8 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 |
| 9 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.73 |
| 10 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.74 |
| 11 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 12 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013