| Project Name | napB |
| Project Name | napB |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 115.9 | 85.1 | 84.9 | 83.1 | 71.0 | 70.6 | 63.1 | 57.0 | 52.6 | 52.1 | 51.2 | 48.6 |
| Cluster size | 289 | 201 | 220 | 202 | 147 | 152 | 155 | 141 | 140 | 135 | 108 | 110 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 2.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.15 | 4.71 | 4.24 | 4.29 | 2.99 | 5.08 | 3.12 | 2.80 | 3.58 | 2.85 | 3.15 | 4.32 |
| GDT_TS | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.53 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.89 | 5.30 | 3.27 | 4.94 | 4.40 | 5.84 | 4.80 | 4.68 | 4.34 | 6.04 | 4.85 |
| 2 | 2.89 | 0.00 | 5.22 | 3.45 | 5.02 | 4.59 | 5.55 | 4.47 | 4.34 | 3.97 | 5.61 | 4.72 |
| 3 | 5.30 | 5.22 | 0.00 | 4.69 | 4.46 | 4.32 | 3.89 | 4.74 | 3.15 | 4.14 | 4.59 | 3.49 |
| 4 | 3.27 | 3.45 | 4.69 | 0.00 | 3.46 | 4.32 | 4.89 | 3.78 | 3.83 | 3.31 | 4.33 | 4.68 |
| 5 | 4.94 | 5.02 | 4.46 | 3.46 | 0.00 | 4.93 | 3.14 | 2.61 | 3.64 | 2.74 | 2.57 | 4.56 |
| 6 | 4.40 | 4.59 | 4.32 | 4.32 | 4.93 | 0.00 | 4.86 | 5.29 | 4.34 | 4.72 | 5.43 | 3.14 |
| 7 | 5.84 | 5.55 | 3.89 | 4.89 | 3.14 | 4.86 | 0.00 | 3.44 | 3.72 | 3.50 | 3.06 | 3.94 |
| 8 | 4.80 | 4.47 | 4.74 | 3.78 | 2.61 | 5.29 | 3.44 | 0.00 | 3.74 | 2.33 | 2.91 | 4.61 |
| 9 | 4.68 | 4.34 | 3.15 | 3.83 | 3.64 | 4.34 | 3.72 | 3.74 | 0.00 | 3.36 | 3.90 | 3.73 |
| 10 | 4.34 | 3.97 | 4.14 | 3.31 | 2.74 | 4.72 | 3.50 | 2.33 | 3.36 | 0.00 | 3.16 | 4.41 |
| 11 | 6.04 | 5.61 | 4.59 | 4.33 | 2.57 | 5.43 | 3.06 | 2.91 | 3.90 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 4.91 |
| 12 | 4.85 | 4.72 | 3.49 | 4.68 | 4.56 | 3.14 | 3.94 | 4.61 | 3.73 | 4.41 | 4.91 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.53 |
| 2 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.51 | 0.51 |
| 3 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.59 |
| 4 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.57 |
| 5 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.58 |
| 6 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.63 |
| 7 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.53 |
| 8 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.59 |
| 9 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.59 |
| 10 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.58 |
| 11 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.69 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.55 |
| 12 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013