| Project Name | 28ISmut |
| Project Name | 28ISmut |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 416.7 | 389.9 | 318.7 | 269.7 | 228.3 | 140.0 | 139.5 | 137.4 | 88.3 | 74.3 | 54.7 | 32.9 |
| Cluster size | 306 | 302 | 251 | 235 | 194 | 150 | 130 | 140 | 94 | 90 | 74 | 34 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.73 | 1.61 | 1.81 | 1.69 | 1.75 | 2.44 | 2.57 | 1.83 | 1.63 | 2.03 | 3.03 | 4.13 |
| GDT_TS | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.75 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 1.56 | 1.64 | 0.52 | 1.03 | 0.98 | 2.55 | 3.65 |
| 2 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 1.66 | 1.60 | 0.49 | 0.99 | 1.03 | 2.53 | 3.58 |
| 3 | 0.75 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 0.66 | 1.59 | 1.43 | 0.70 | 1.06 | 0.75 | 2.27 | 3.52 |
| 4 | 0.62 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.54 | 1.49 | 1.55 | 0.56 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 2.32 | 3.68 |
| 5 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.66 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 1.42 | 1.60 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.96 | 2.50 | 3.87 |
| 6 | 1.56 | 1.66 | 1.59 | 1.49 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 2.04 | 1.65 | 1.48 | 1.49 | 1.85 | 4.24 |
| 7 | 1.64 | 1.60 | 1.43 | 1.55 | 1.60 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 1.53 | 1.90 | 1.60 | 2.70 | 3.94 |
| 8 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 1.65 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 1.04 | 1.09 | 2.55 | 3.64 |
| 9 | 1.03 | 0.99 | 1.06 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 1.48 | 1.90 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.04 | 2.40 | 4.12 |
| 10 | 0.98 | 1.03 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.96 | 1.49 | 1.60 | 1.09 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 2.02 | 3.68 |
| 11 | 2.55 | 2.53 | 2.27 | 2.32 | 2.50 | 1.85 | 2.70 | 2.55 | 2.40 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 3.12 |
| 12 | 3.65 | 3.58 | 3.52 | 3.68 | 3.87 | 4.24 | 3.94 | 3.64 | 4.12 | 3.68 | 3.12 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.86 |
| 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.88 |
| 3 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.91 | 0.88 |
| 4 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.91 | 0.88 |
| 5 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.86 |
| 6 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| 7 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.83 |
| 8 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.86 |
| 9 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.85 |
| 10 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.88 |
| 11 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.89 |
| 12 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013