| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 256.9 | 253.7 | 154.6 | 151.3 | 132.9 | 128.4 | 120.6 | 104.7 | 74.2 | 58.8 | 49.7 | 32.3 |
| Cluster size | 312 | 313 | 202 | 175 | 190 | 191 | 166 | 141 | 105 | 68 | 93 | 44 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.4 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 6.93 | 6.35 | 6.47 | 6.95 | 6.48 | 4.28 | 6.02 | 6.97 | 6.66 | 4.98 | 6.15 | 6.55 |
| GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 4.02 | 3.61 | 3.83 | 2.02 | 4.26 | 3.41 | 2.38 | 3.06 | 3.89 | 2.91 | 2.51 |
| 2 | 4.02 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 2.52 | 3.56 | 3.46 | 2.15 | 4.17 | 4.81 | 3.15 | 3.92 | 4.51 |
| 3 | 3.61 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 2.63 | 3.20 | 3.38 | 2.12 | 3.71 | 4.36 | 3.12 | 3.70 | 4.18 |
| 4 | 3.83 | 2.52 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 3.27 | 4.00 | 2.91 | 3.94 | 4.89 | 3.25 | 3.78 | 4.17 |
| 5 | 2.02 | 3.56 | 3.20 | 3.27 | 0.00 | 3.69 | 3.04 | 2.40 | 3.25 | 3.34 | 2.73 | 2.39 |
| 6 | 4.26 | 3.46 | 3.38 | 4.00 | 3.69 | 0.00 | 3.25 | 4.18 | 4.26 | 2.92 | 3.83 | 4.25 |
| 7 | 3.41 | 2.15 | 2.12 | 2.91 | 3.04 | 3.25 | 0.00 | 3.85 | 4.23 | 2.74 | 3.49 | 4.07 |
| 8 | 2.38 | 4.17 | 3.71 | 3.94 | 2.40 | 4.18 | 3.85 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 4.21 | 2.78 | 2.39 |
| 9 | 3.06 | 4.81 | 4.36 | 4.89 | 3.25 | 4.26 | 4.23 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 4.60 | 3.05 | 2.93 |
| 10 | 3.89 | 3.15 | 3.12 | 3.25 | 3.34 | 2.92 | 2.74 | 4.21 | 4.60 | 0.00 | 3.39 | 3.98 |
| 11 | 2.91 | 3.92 | 3.70 | 3.78 | 2.73 | 3.83 | 3.49 | 2.78 | 3.05 | 3.39 | 0.00 | 2.94 |
| 12 | 2.51 | 4.51 | 4.18 | 4.17 | 2.39 | 4.25 | 4.07 | 2.39 | 2.93 | 3.98 | 2.94 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| 2 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.72 |
| 3 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.70 |
| 5 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.74 |
| 6 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.72 |
| 7 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.70 |
| 8 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| 10 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
| 11 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 12 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013