Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 154.6 | 145.9 | 127.5 | 126.2 | 125.0 | 120.7 | 107.5 | 105.1 | 88.1 | 87.5 | 86.1 | 51.1 |
Cluster size | 224 | 244 | 200 | 184 | 176 | 192 | 157 | 167 | 126 | 147 | 115 | 68 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.54 | 3.22 | 3.16 | 2.88 | 2.90 | 2.77 | 3.32 | 2.82 | 3.13 | 2.93 | 3.04 | 2.85 |
GDT_TS | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.08 | 2.29 | 1.69 | 2.38 | 2.04 | 2.46 | 1.96 | 2.52 | 2.21 | 2.56 | 2.04 |
2 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 2.48 | 1.99 | 2.78 | 2.25 | 2.00 | 2.17 | 2.51 | 2.24 | 2.97 | 2.55 |
3 | 2.29 | 2.48 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 2.76 | 1.95 | 2.85 | 2.13 | 3.27 | 2.68 | 2.70 | 2.41 |
4 | 1.69 | 1.99 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 2.44 | 2.06 | 2.46 | 1.97 | 2.76 | 2.42 | 2.61 | 2.03 |
5 | 2.38 | 2.78 | 2.76 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 2.54 | 2.98 | 2.60 | 3.31 | 2.89 | 2.32 | 2.59 |
6 | 2.04 | 2.25 | 1.95 | 2.06 | 2.54 | 0.00 | 2.45 | 1.78 | 2.99 | 2.50 | 2.65 | 2.11 |
7 | 2.46 | 2.00 | 2.85 | 2.46 | 2.98 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 2.53 | 2.54 | 2.21 | 3.43 | 2.74 |
8 | 1.96 | 2.17 | 2.13 | 1.97 | 2.60 | 1.78 | 2.53 | 0.00 | 2.90 | 2.49 | 3.00 | 2.41 |
9 | 2.52 | 2.51 | 3.27 | 2.76 | 3.31 | 2.99 | 2.54 | 2.90 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 3.86 | 3.16 |
10 | 2.21 | 2.24 | 2.68 | 2.42 | 2.89 | 2.50 | 2.21 | 2.49 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 3.29 | 2.76 |
11 | 2.56 | 2.97 | 2.70 | 2.61 | 2.32 | 2.65 | 3.43 | 3.00 | 3.86 | 3.29 | 0.00 | 2.53 |
12 | 2.04 | 2.55 | 2.41 | 2.03 | 2.59 | 2.11 | 2.74 | 2.41 | 3.16 | 2.76 | 2.53 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
2 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.70 |
3 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.73 |
4 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
5 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.72 |
6 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.75 |
7 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
8 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
9 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
10 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.67 |
11 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
12 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013