Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 255.1 | 154.7 | 139.7 | 128.9 | 125.3 | 117.3 | 115.9 | 93.8 | 89.7 | 85.9 | 67.2 | 44.7 |
Cluster size | 361 | 207 | 199 | 187 | 191 | 163 | 164 | 132 | 118 | 117 | 101 | 60 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.3 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.76 | 2.61 | 2.89 | 3.09 | 2.72 | 2.92 | 3.15 | 3.13 | 3.00 | 3.01 | 2.86 | 2.57 |
GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.01 | 2.25 | 2.58 | 2.18 | 2.21 | 2.83 | 2.43 | 2.39 | 2.23 | 2.45 | 2.29 |
2 | 2.01 | 0.00 | 1.93 | 2.30 | 1.74 | 2.06 | 2.40 | 2.18 | 1.96 | 2.36 | 2.72 | 2.53 |
3 | 2.25 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 1.95 | 2.05 | 2.03 | 2.03 | 1.93 | 2.38 | 2.94 | 2.64 |
4 | 2.58 | 2.30 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 2.16 | 2.56 | 2.39 | 2.17 | 2.10 | 2.51 | 3.07 | 2.91 |
5 | 2.18 | 1.74 | 1.95 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 2.12 | 2.52 | 2.22 | 1.88 | 2.27 | 2.74 | 2.44 |
6 | 2.21 | 2.06 | 2.05 | 2.56 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 2.54 | 1.77 | 2.04 | 2.07 | 2.73 | 2.41 |
7 | 2.83 | 2.40 | 2.03 | 2.39 | 2.52 | 2.54 | 0.00 | 2.17 | 2.35 | 2.52 | 3.38 | 3.31 |
8 | 2.43 | 2.18 | 2.03 | 2.17 | 2.22 | 1.77 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 2.01 | 2.06 | 2.92 | 2.86 |
9 | 2.39 | 1.96 | 1.93 | 2.10 | 1.88 | 2.04 | 2.35 | 2.01 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 3.02 | 2.89 |
10 | 2.23 | 2.36 | 2.38 | 2.51 | 2.27 | 2.07 | 2.52 | 2.06 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 2.66 |
11 | 2.45 | 2.72 | 2.94 | 3.07 | 2.74 | 2.73 | 3.38 | 2.92 | 3.02 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 2.04 |
12 | 2.29 | 2.53 | 2.64 | 2.91 | 2.44 | 2.41 | 3.31 | 2.86 | 2.89 | 2.66 | 2.04 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.72 |
2 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.73 |
3 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.70 |
4 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
5 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
6 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.72 |
7 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.64 |
8 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
9 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.65 |
10 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
11 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.76 |
12 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013