Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 175.2 | 155.6 | 142.7 | 135.4 | 135.1 | 108.2 | 98.9 | 95.9 | 87.8 | 86.2 | 80.2 | 73.2 |
Cluster size | 251 | 241 | 210 | 194 | 188 | 145 | 136 | 126 | 137 | 130 | 131 | 111 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.98 | 2.64 | 2.54 | 2.99 | 3.25 | 3.12 | 3.27 | 2.75 | 2.22 | 3.34 | 2.71 | 3.10 |
GDT_TS | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.67 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 2.23 | 1.73 | 2.20 | 2.13 | 2.19 | 2.51 | 2.42 | 2.13 | 2.00 | 2.37 |
2 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 1.79 | 2.28 | 2.55 | 2.43 | 2.48 | 2.08 | 2.11 | 2.60 | 2.29 | 1.99 |
3 | 2.23 | 1.79 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 2.46 | 2.56 | 2.59 | 2.41 | 1.96 | 2.39 | 2.32 | 2.09 |
4 | 1.73 | 2.28 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 1.96 | 2.16 | 2.39 | 2.41 | 1.81 | 1.82 | 2.39 |
5 | 2.20 | 2.55 | 2.46 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 2.38 | 2.53 | 2.61 | 2.58 | 2.32 | 2.30 | 2.53 |
6 | 2.13 | 2.43 | 2.56 | 1.96 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 2.63 | 2.11 | 2.62 | 2.30 | 2.10 | 2.59 |
7 | 2.19 | 2.48 | 2.59 | 2.16 | 2.53 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 2.77 | 2.26 | 2.30 | 2.52 |
8 | 2.51 | 2.08 | 2.41 | 2.39 | 2.61 | 2.11 | 2.78 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 2.67 | 2.18 | 2.16 |
9 | 2.42 | 2.11 | 1.96 | 2.41 | 2.58 | 2.62 | 2.77 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 2.46 | 2.57 |
10 | 2.13 | 2.60 | 2.39 | 1.81 | 2.32 | 2.30 | 2.26 | 2.67 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 2.18 | 2.47 |
11 | 2.00 | 2.29 | 2.32 | 1.82 | 2.30 | 2.10 | 2.30 | 2.18 | 2.46 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 2.16 |
12 | 2.37 | 1.99 | 2.09 | 2.39 | 2.53 | 2.59 | 2.52 | 2.16 | 2.57 | 2.47 | 2.16 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.73 |
2 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.78 |
3 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
4 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.72 |
5 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.74 |
6 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.70 |
7 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.70 |
8 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.77 |
9 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
10 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
11 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.78 |
12 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013