Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 171.6 | 157.6 | 135.7 | 133.2 | 124.3 | 112.7 | 107.8 | 103.6 | 94.3 | 88.8 | 83.6 | 67.3 |
Cluster size | 245 | 224 | 210 | 186 | 187 | 154 | 172 | 137 | 145 | 133 | 98 | 109 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.92 | 3.23 | 3.47 | 3.79 | 3.70 | 3.77 | 4.38 | 3.44 | 3.44 | 3.42 | 4.00 | 3.66 |
GDT_TS | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.57 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.94 | 2.97 | 3.64 | 2.80 | 3.44 | 2.74 | 3.44 | 2.83 | 2.99 | 3.21 | 3.79 |
2 | 2.94 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 2.82 | 2.83 | 3.10 | 3.16 | 2.74 | 2.78 | 2.51 | 3.50 | 2.68 |
3 | 2.97 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 2.76 | 2.23 | 2.48 | 2.97 | 2.69 | 2.28 | 2.13 | 3.00 | 2.43 |
4 | 3.64 | 2.82 | 2.76 | 0.00 | 3.07 | 2.54 | 4.05 | 3.54 | 3.15 | 2.28 | 2.71 | 2.73 |
5 | 2.80 | 2.83 | 2.23 | 3.07 | 0.00 | 2.45 | 2.84 | 2.79 | 2.24 | 2.49 | 2.56 | 3.15 |
6 | 3.44 | 3.10 | 2.48 | 2.54 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 3.50 | 3.40 | 2.66 | 2.18 | 2.35 | 2.97 |
7 | 2.74 | 3.16 | 2.97 | 4.05 | 2.84 | 3.50 | 0.00 | 3.13 | 2.89 | 3.21 | 3.71 | 3.61 |
8 | 3.44 | 2.74 | 2.69 | 3.54 | 2.79 | 3.40 | 3.13 | 0.00 | 2.66 | 2.90 | 3.65 | 2.89 |
9 | 2.83 | 2.78 | 2.28 | 3.15 | 2.24 | 2.66 | 2.89 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 2.46 | 2.73 | 2.76 |
10 | 2.99 | 2.51 | 2.13 | 2.28 | 2.49 | 2.18 | 3.21 | 2.90 | 2.46 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 2.79 |
11 | 3.21 | 3.50 | 3.00 | 2.71 | 2.56 | 2.35 | 3.71 | 3.65 | 2.73 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 3.54 |
12 | 3.79 | 2.68 | 2.43 | 2.73 | 3.15 | 2.97 | 3.61 | 2.89 | 2.76 | 2.79 | 3.54 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.62 |
2 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.67 |
3 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.72 |
4 | 0.58 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.65 |
5 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.67 |
6 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
7 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.65 |
8 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.66 |
9 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
10 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.70 |
11 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.66 |
12 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013