| Project Name | richard_1cu1 |
| Project Name | richard_1cu1 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 190.7 | 181.7 | 154.1 | 153.8 | 147.9 | 129.1 | 114.5 | 112.1 | 71.5 | 65.9 | 64.6 | 44.1 |
| Cluster size | 235 | 219 | 229 | 215 | 200 | 210 | 161 | 189 | 95 | 102 | 96 | 49 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.07 | 5.26 | 5.01 | 4.94 | 5.41 | 5.51 | 6.27 | 5.43 | 4.97 | 4.75 | 5.57 | 6.41 |
| GDT_TS | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.49 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.21 | 2.24 | 3.74 | 4.11 | 3.08 | 3.84 | 5.09 | 2.54 | 3.18 | 3.75 | 4.94 |
| 2 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 2.64 | 4.05 | 4.88 | 3.60 | 4.52 | 4.85 | 2.32 | 3.31 | 4.32 | 5.89 |
| 3 | 2.24 | 2.64 | 0.00 | 3.67 | 4.07 | 2.83 | 3.59 | 4.74 | 2.35 | 2.90 | 3.58 | 4.88 |
| 4 | 3.74 | 4.05 | 3.67 | 0.00 | 2.37 | 4.53 | 5.08 | 3.14 | 3.21 | 4.39 | 2.53 | 5.50 |
| 5 | 4.11 | 4.88 | 4.07 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 4.65 | 5.05 | 4.01 | 3.96 | 4.67 | 2.51 | 4.67 |
| 6 | 3.08 | 3.60 | 2.83 | 4.53 | 4.65 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 5.49 | 3.68 | 2.51 | 4.34 | 4.01 |
| 7 | 3.84 | 4.52 | 3.59 | 5.08 | 5.05 | 2.67 | 0.00 | 6.16 | 4.52 | 3.86 | 4.70 | 3.18 |
| 8 | 5.09 | 4.85 | 4.74 | 3.14 | 4.01 | 5.49 | 6.16 | 0.00 | 4.16 | 5.23 | 3.79 | 6.77 |
| 9 | 2.54 | 2.32 | 2.35 | 3.21 | 3.96 | 3.68 | 4.52 | 4.16 | 0.00 | 3.35 | 3.37 | 5.64 |
| 10 | 3.18 | 3.31 | 2.90 | 4.39 | 4.67 | 2.51 | 3.86 | 5.23 | 3.35 | 0.00 | 4.71 | 4.61 |
| 11 | 3.75 | 4.32 | 3.58 | 2.53 | 2.51 | 4.34 | 4.70 | 3.79 | 3.37 | 4.71 | 0.00 | 5.20 |
| 12 | 4.94 | 5.89 | 4.88 | 5.50 | 4.67 | 4.01 | 3.18 | 6.77 | 5.64 | 4.61 | 5.20 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.67 |
| 2 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.62 |
| 3 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.66 |
| 4 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 0.65 |
| 5 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 0.64 |
| 6 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.59 | 0.71 |
| 7 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.79 |
| 8 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.54 |
| 9 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.64 |
| 10 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.69 |
| 11 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.62 |
| 12 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013