| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 218.0 | 188.6 | 184.0 | 159.5 | 115.4 | 104.9 | 100.7 | 95.1 | 91.5 | 76.8 | 73.3 | 59.1 |
| Cluster size | 279 | 247 | 225 | 242 | 174 | 124 | 123 | 153 | 137 | 90 | 121 | 85 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 6.05 | 6.06 | 7.02 | 5.93 | 6.03 | 7.22 | 5.86 | 5.21 | 6.31 | 6.27 | 5.90 | 4.99 |
| GDT_TS | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.66 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 2.07 | 1.97 | 2.47 | 2.62 | 1.91 | 2.67 | 1.96 | 2.11 | 2.28 | 3.11 |
| 2 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 2.70 | 2.52 | 3.05 | 3.31 | 2.29 | 2.37 | 2.38 | 2.70 | 2.83 | 3.48 |
| 3 | 2.07 | 2.70 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 2.45 | 2.13 | 2.38 | 3.65 | 2.38 | 1.99 | 2.47 | 3.54 |
| 4 | 1.97 | 2.52 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 2.50 | 2.10 | 2.77 | 1.95 | 1.82 | 2.07 | 2.80 |
| 5 | 2.47 | 3.05 | 2.45 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 2.73 | 2.25 | 3.43 | 2.64 | 2.13 | 2.13 | 2.63 |
| 6 | 2.62 | 3.31 | 2.13 | 2.50 | 2.73 | 0.00 | 2.90 | 4.11 | 2.44 | 2.18 | 2.78 | 3.74 |
| 7 | 1.91 | 2.29 | 2.38 | 2.10 | 2.25 | 2.90 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 2.12 | 2.24 | 2.39 | 2.84 |
| 8 | 2.67 | 2.37 | 3.65 | 2.77 | 3.43 | 4.11 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 2.76 | 3.27 | 3.20 | 3.41 |
| 9 | 1.96 | 2.38 | 2.38 | 1.95 | 2.64 | 2.44 | 2.12 | 2.76 | 0.00 | 2.08 | 2.52 | 3.12 |
| 10 | 2.11 | 2.70 | 1.99 | 1.82 | 2.13 | 2.18 | 2.24 | 3.27 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 3.09 |
| 11 | 2.28 | 2.83 | 2.47 | 2.07 | 2.13 | 2.78 | 2.39 | 3.20 | 2.52 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 2.94 |
| 12 | 3.11 | 3.48 | 3.54 | 2.80 | 2.63 | 3.74 | 2.84 | 3.41 | 3.12 | 3.09 | 2.94 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.75 |
| 2 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| 3 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| 4 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.74 |
| 5 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.77 |
| 6 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.72 |
| 7 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| 8 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.71 |
| 9 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| 10 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.73 |
| 11 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.73 |
| 12 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013